Generalised Momentum: Defs & Meaning

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Incand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definitions of generalized momentum in classical mechanics, specifically comparing the equations \( p_i = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_i} \) and \( p_i = \frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot{q}_i} \). It is established that \( T \) represents kinetic energy and that the first definition is the canonical form used when potential energy is independent of the coordinate \( q \). The conversation highlights that in systems with magnetic fields and electric charges, potential energy can depend on velocities, thus complicating the use of the kinetic energy-based definition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of kinetic and potential energy
  • Knowledge of generalized coordinates and their derivatives
  • Basic grasp of classical mechanics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lagrangian mechanics and its applications in physics
  • Explore the implications of potential energy depending on velocity in electromagnetic systems
  • Learn about canonical momentum and its role in Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between generalized coordinates and their time derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, Lagrangian dynamics, and anyone interested in the implications of generalized momentum in complex systems.

Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47
I have two books that define generalised momentum differently. Either
##p_i = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q_i}##
or
##p_i = \frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot q_i}##.
Is this since defining generalised momentum only make sense when the potential energy is independent of a coordinate ##q## and hence the above definitions are equal? Or is one of these more general than the other?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The differentiations should be done with respect to the time derivative of ##q##, not ##q## itself. Is ##T## the kinetic energy? In most simple mechanical systems the potential energy is not dependent on velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
hilbert2 said:
The differentiations should be done with respect to the time derivative of ##q##, not ##q## itself. Is ##T## the kinetic energy? In most simple mechanical systems the potential energy is not dependent on velocity.

Thanks, missed the dots. Added them now. Yes ##T## is the kinetic energy. Is it possible that the potential energy ##V## depends on ##\dot q##? Is one of these definitions correct in that case?
 
If there are magnetic fields and electric charges in the system, the potential energy depends on velocities. Then you can't use the definition where you differentiate ##T##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
Cheers! That was a good example!
 
The momentum canonically conjugated to the generalized coordinate ##q^i## is defined by
$$p_i=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}^i},$$
and nothing else!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
683
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K