Generalised Momentum: Defs & Meaning

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Incand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47
I have two books that define generalised momentum differently. Either
##p_i = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q_i}##
or
##p_i = \frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot q_i}##.
Is this since defining generalised momentum only make sense when the potential energy is independent of a coordinate ##q## and hence the above definitions are equal? Or is one of these more general than the other?
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
The differentiations should be done with respect to the time derivative of ##q##, not ##q## itself. Is ##T## the kinetic energy? In most simple mechanical systems the potential energy is not dependent on velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
hilbert2 said:
The differentiations should be done with respect to the time derivative of ##q##, not ##q## itself. Is ##T## the kinetic energy? In most simple mechanical systems the potential energy is not dependent on velocity.

Thanks, missed the dots. Added them now. Yes ##T## is the kinetic energy. Is it possible that the potential energy ##V## depends on ##\dot q##? Is one of these definitions correct in that case?
 
If there are magnetic fields and electric charges in the system, the potential energy depends on velocities. Then you can't use the definition where you differentiate ##T##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
Cheers! That was a good example!