Generalized Schrödinger equation

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 2K views
Maximise24
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
This equation (see attachment) appears in one of Prof. Susskinds's lectures on Quantum Mechanics: in trying to differentiate the coefficients of the eigenvectors of a wave function with respect to time, an exponential e^(-iEt) is introduced for alpha.

I can see that d/dt e^(-iEt) = -iE e^(-iEt), but why is the second part e^(-iEt) not in the top equation in the attachment? Is it disregarded because it's just a number?

Thanks for any help provided!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Attachment seems to have got lost.
 

Attachments

  • QM.jpg
    QM.jpg
    14.6 KB · Views: 555
OK, so [itex]\alpha[/itex]j(0)e-iEt has simply been conflated into [itex]\alpha[/itex]j? Can you just do that since e-iEt is not a constant?
Thanks!
 
Maximise24 said:
OK, so [itex]\alpha[/itex]j(0)e-iEt has simply been conflated into [itex]\alpha[/itex]j? Can you just do that since e-iEt is not a constant?
Thanks!

Aj is defined on the second line of your picture. It doesn't look like a constant to me.:smile: