Generator of the additive gr. Z_m

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sutupidmath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generator Gr
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The proposition states that \(\bar a\) is a generator of the additive group \(Z_m\) if and only if \(\gcd(m, a) = 1\). The discussion outlines the proof structure for cyclic groups and additive groups, demonstrating that if \(\gcd(s, q) = 1\), then \(s \cdot a\) generates the group \(G\). The proof relies on the properties of integers and their relationships within the group structure, confirming that the conditions for generation hold true in both cyclic and additive contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically cyclic groups and additive groups.
  • Knowledge of the greatest common divisor (gcd) and its properties.
  • Familiarity with Lagrange's theorem in the context of group orders.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of integers and their linear combinations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of cyclic groups in detail, focusing on generators and their conditions.
  • Learn about the application of Lagrange's theorem in both additive and multiplicative groups.
  • Explore the implications of the gcd in number theory and its role in group generation.
  • Investigate the structure of the additive group \(Z_m\) and its generators.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in group theory and its applications in number theory.

sutupidmath
Messages
1,629
Reaction score
4
Hi all,

I am having trouble proving the following proposition:

\bar a is a generator of the additive group Z_m if and only if gcm(m,a)=1.

Well, first let's start with what i know.

I know how to prove the following:

Let G=[a] be a cyclic group of order q. Show that a^s is a generator of G, iff gcd(s,q)=1.

proof:
(<=) Suppose that gcd(s,q)=1, then there exist some integers x,y such that

1=sx+qy, so

a^1=a^{sx}a^{qy}=(a^s)^x(a^q)^y=(a^s)^xe^y=(a^s)^x so since there exists an integer x, such that (a^s)^x=a then G=[a^s]

(=>) Now, suppose that a^s is a generator of G. THen there should exist some integer k such that

(a^s)^k=a=&gt;a^{sk}=a=&gt;a^{sk-1}=e now from a theorem we know that

q|(sk-1)=> there exists some integer n such that sk-1=mq=>1=sk+(-m)q=>gcd(s,q)=1.


Now i tried to translate this for the additive groups. And here is where the problems start to come in play, for only to get worse when i go to Z_m.

So, i am trying to prove the following:

Let G be an additive group generated by a, where o(G)=q. Prove that s*a is a generator of G iff gcd(s,q)=1.
Proof:
(<=) Suppose that gcd(s,q)=1. Now, as before, there exist x,y integers, such that

1=sx+qy

now: 1*a=(sx+qy)a=(sx)a+(qy)a= x(sa)+y(qa).---(@)
(Now, here i believe that if we Translate the Lagranges theorem into terms of an additive group it would be sth like this, right: "Let G be a finite group with order r. Then the order of each subgroup H in G, and the order of each element a of G is an integral divisor or r. Also r*g=0 for every el. g in G."Basically i am concerned whether the last part would be correct that is: from g^r =e into r*g=e=0. Since in the book we are using we are denoting with 0 the identity in an additive group.)

Now, if this is true, then we get from (@) a=x(sa). Now since there is an integer x, such that this holds, i assume we can conclude that G=[sa], that is sa generates the group G.

(=>) now let's suppose that sa is a generator for the group G. Then there exists some integer k such that k(sa)=a=> k(sa)-a=0 => (ks-1)a=0. Now, since the order of a is q. it follows that

q|(ks-1)=> ks-1=mq =>1=ks +(-m)q , so it follows that gcd(s,q)=1.

Well, let me give a crack to my main issue now:

\bar a is a generator of the additive group Z_m if and only if gcm(m,a)=1.
Proof: again let's suppose that gcd(a,m)=1. so there are integers x, y such that

1=ax+my.

Now, i know that \bar a = a+[m] so let [\bar a]=\{k\bar a:k\in Z\}=\{ka+k(rm):r,k\in Z\} in particular let u\in [\bar a] so, u=ak+k(rm)

So, this would mean that any linear combination of a and m is also in a+[m]. Now since

1=ax+my, i am saying that 1\in a+[m]=\bar a

ok let's stop here, cuz, i lost my stream of thought!

Any hints, ideas, would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, i know the previous post is way too long, so if you don't have time to have a look at it, the whole thing is about the following:

Prove that
\bar a is a generator of the additive group Z_m if and only if gcm(m,a)=1.
 
Nevermind, i figuret it out. Thnx though!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K