Undergrad Generators of translations

Click For Summary
In infinite-dimensional representations, the generators of translation are expressed as i ∂μ, while the Lorentz group generators are represented as i (xμ∂ν - xν∂μ). In finite-dimensional cases, the Lorentz group generators take the form of boost and rotation matrices. Here, the generators of translation are represented as matrices with elements i δx, indicating infinitesimal translations in a specific basis. Thus, the distinction lies in the representation type, where finite-dimensional generators correspond to infinitesimal displacements rather than partial derivatives.
redtree
Messages
335
Reaction score
15
TL;DR
The relationship between the generators of translation and the representation of the Poincare group
I just want to make sure I understand this correctly.

For an infinite-dimensional representation, the generators of translation can be written as ##i \frac{\partial}{\partial_{\mu}}= i \partial_{\mu}##, where the generators of the Lorentz group can be written as ##i (x^{\mu}\partial_{\nu} - x^{\nu}\partial_{\mu})##.

However, for a finite-dimensional case, where the generators of the Lorentz group are formulated as boost and rotation matrices, the generators of translation can be written as matrices with elements ##i \delta x## in the appropriate row/column locations, where ##\delta x## denotes an infinitesimal translation in some basis of ##x##.

In other words, in finite-dimensional representation, the generators of translation are infinitesimal displacements (instead of partial derivates as in the infinite-dimensional representation).
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K