Geodesic in 2D Space: Understanding the Statement

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the statement regarding timelike geodesics in a specific 2D space defined by the metric ds² = (1/u²)(-du² + dv²). The user struggles to derive the geodesic equation u² = v² + av + b using the Euler-Lagrange equations. They initially apply the equations but find it challenging to connect the results to the statement. A suggested approach involves simplifying the Lagrangian to show that it does not depend on v, leading to a differential equation that reveals the desired solution. Ultimately, the user confirms their understanding after following this guidance.
vidi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am having trouble understanding how the following statement (taken from some old notes) is true:

>For a 2 dimensional space such that ds^2=\frac{1}{u^2}(-du^2+dv^2)
the timelike geodesics are given by u^2=v^2+av+b where a,b are constants.




Homework Equations


Euler-Lagrange, Normalisation condition


The Attempt at a Solution



When I see "geodesics" I jump to the Euler-Lagrange equations. They give me
\frac{d}{d\lambda}(-2\frac{\dot u}{u^2})=(-\dot u^2+\dot v^2)(-\frac{2}{u^3})\\<br /> \implies \frac{\ddot u}{u^2}-2\frac{\dot u^2}{u^3}=\frac{1}{u^3}(-\dot u^2+\dot v^2)\\<br /> \implies u\ddot u-\dot u^2-\dot v^2=0
and
\frac{d}{d\lambda}(2\frac{\dot v}{u^2})=0\\<br /> \implies \dot v=cu^2
where c is some constant.

Timelike implies \dot x^a\dot x_a=-1 where I have adopted the (-+++) signature.

I can't for the life of me see how the statement results from these. Would someone mind explaining? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do not expand the Euler-Lagrange equations. But do a trick like this:

The Lagrangian is:

L = \frac{1}{u}\sqrt{\left(\frac{dv}{du}\right)^2-1}= \frac{1}{u}\sqrt{v&#039;^2-1}

Now you see this doesn't depend on $v$. The Euler Lagrange equations then give:

0=\frac{\partial L}{\partial v}=\frac{d}{du}\frac{\partial L}{\partial v&#039;} \Longrightarrow \frac{\partial L}{\partial v&#039;}=C

Now calculate \frac{\partial L}{\partial v&#039;} from the Lagrangian and put it equal to the constant C. This will lead to a differential equation which gives the solution you were looking for.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Thaakisfox, I've got it now!
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K