Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Geometrical methods of mathematical physics

  1. Aug 29, 2006 #1
    I'm reading Schutz's text Geometrical methods of mathematical physics right now as a part of a diredcted study (Two of my former math professors and I wish to learn the subject together so we formed a group for self-study). I know the material in a general sense but not at the precision of this wonderful text. But there is a comment that I don't understand on page 39 which, regarding the tangent-bundle on a 2-sphere, states that
    Okay. I may be burned out on this stuff by now but frankly I don't see how they reach the conclusion that there is no Cinf vector field on S2 which is nowhere zero.

    Help? :confused:

    Pete :smile:
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 29, 2006 #2

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    That's known as the "hairy ball" theorem. TIf you imagine a ball (or someone's head) completely covered with hair, there must be a "whorl" or a place where there is no hair. Basically, if you start with a continuous, non-zero, vector field at a point and follow along both directions of great circles around the ball, at some point, the directions will conflict.

    If you are asking "how they reach the conclusion that there is no Cinf vector field on S2 which is nowhere zero" in that quote, they don't, they simply assert it. If memory serves, that is a difficult theorem to prove.
     
  4. Aug 29, 2006 #3

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Likewise consider the atmosphere of the earth; the theorem states that at any given moment, somewhere on earth, the wind is calm.

    The reason is basically that if you had a vector field with no zero, you could use it to construct a shrinking of the sphere, in itself, to a point, and this is impossible; the 2-sphere is o-connected (i.e you can get from any point on it to any other by a continuous path). And it is 1-connected (i.e you can shrink any closed curve, in the sphere, to a point), but it is not 2-connected.
     
  5. Aug 29, 2006 #4

    Hurkyl

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It's saying that you find some way to use your vector field to define a family of continuous maps from the sphere to itself. You could imagine the vector field as describing something sophisticated like a flow... or something simpler like "this point moves that-a-way".

    Because the sphere is compact, that guarantees you can find a parameter sufficiently small so that the only way a point could be mapped to itself is if the corresponding tangent vector at that point is zero.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Geometrical methods of mathematical physics
  1. Geometrical Proofs (Replies: 3)

  2. Geometric product (Replies: 5)

Loading...