Georgia Tech Freshman Asks Questions About School & Nuclear Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Collatz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    School
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a freshman at Georgia Tech interested in specializing in nuclear physics and seeking advice on undergraduate research opportunities, potential graduate schools, and the reputation of Georgia Tech's physics program. The scope includes academic guidance, research prospects, and comparative evaluations of institutions in the field of nuclear physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that seeking out a nuclear physicist for undergraduate research opportunities is beneficial, emphasizing the importance of being proactive.
  • One participant recommends Michigan State University as a top choice for a PhD in nuclear physics, citing its new facility and positive environment.
  • Another participant challenges the claim that Michigan State's new facility will be the best in the US, referencing the significance of RHIC and the specific focus of the new facility on rare ions.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the availability of nuclear physicists at Georgia Tech and advise the original poster to focus on building a solid foundation in physics rather than worrying about specialization too early.
  • There is a discussion about the term "best" in relation to nuclear facilities, with participants noting that it depends on the specific area of research interest.
  • One participant points out that Georgia Tech lacks a strong nuclear physics program, suggesting that undergraduates should concentrate on general physics studies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reputation of various institutions for nuclear physics, the significance of specific facilities, and the appropriateness of the original poster's concerns about specialization at this stage. No consensus is reached on these points.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the current status of facilities and the evolving nature of academic programs, which may affect future opportunities and rankings.

Collatz
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi I am an entering freshman going to Georgia Tech in the fall and I plan to major in physics.

Now even though it is probably too early for me to decide this I want to specialize in Nuclear Physics, and of course get my Doctorate. Basically I plan to stay in school till I get my doctorate. Anyways, I was wondering, would it be helpful for me to seek a nuclear physicist and ask them about undergraduate research opportunities early on? And also, what would be some great schools to specialize in nuclear physics? I was wondering about MIT, but I'm not sure if this is just some generic thought that since they are MIT..they would of course have what I need.

All of this is based off of the fact that I think all of the nuclear physicist here are Emeritus and I am basically guessing that I wouldn't get a nuclear physicist as an advisor here, since I don't think there are many.

Here are the questions again in case I digressed and lost you, I do that...

1. Should I seek a nuclear physicist on campus for Undergrad research opportunities?
2. What would be a great fit for grad school if I wanted to specialize in nuclear physics?
3. How great of a school is GaTech for physics in general, and Nuclear physics?
Plus any other helpful advice you could give a budding freshman majoring in physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.) You should always ask, you should always keep your ears open for those opportunities. Research will not fall into your lap- you have to go out and seek it.
2.) For a PhD in Nuclear physics consider Michigan State. They're ranked number one in the world (for nuclear), they recently got a grant from the DOE to build a new facility (will be the best nuclear facility in the US). It is extremely competitive, but worth it. Speaking from experience the people are incredibly nice. You get the best nuclear education without the "intellectual snobbery" that occasionally comes with a place like MIT or CalTech.
3.) I have no idea.
 
Michigan State is certainly ranked up there for nuclear physics, but I wouldn't call the facility they're constructing as "the best nuclear facility in the US", because RHIC will have something to say about that. It is also a particular facility that make use of rare ions, so it is studying something a bit different.

Zz.
 
Collatz said:
Now even though it is probably too early for me to decide this I want to specialize in Nuclear Physics, and of course get my Doctorate.

I would say so.

Collatz said:
would it be helpful for me to seek a nuclear physicist and ask them about undergraduate research opportunities early on? And also, what would be some great schools to specialize in nuclear physics?

I suppose you could ask though I'm not sure if you'd have much to offer as a freshman: you haven't even started studying nuclear physics. It's always good to build contacts and express interests, however.

Collatz said:
Now even though it is probably too early for me to decide this I want to specialize in Nuclear Physics, and of course get my Doctorate.

I would say so.

Collatz said:
All of this is based off of the fact that I think all of the nuclear physicist here are Emeritus and I am basically guessing that I wouldn't get a nuclear physicist as an advisor here, since I don't think there are many.

I wouldn't bother thinking about anything like this for the moment - you're getting years ahead - things will be different by the time you're finished your undergraduate. Knowing which post-graduate schools to apply to for a given subject is one thing, but what will happen even if you make a list? You can't apply for another few years, and by then there will have been changes at many schools so the situation might have changed.
 
Goalie33 said:
Sorry, let me clarify: FRIB (the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams) will be the best nuclear facility at a university in the US.

The problem with "best" is that it leads to the question "best for what"? If you want to study extremes of isospin, FRIB is a great machine. If your interested in light nuclei reactions relevant to stellar cores, you'd be better off at Notre Dame. If your interested in heavy ion reactions at low to moderate energies, Berkeley would be the place for you. And so on.
 
Getting back to the OP's question, Georgia Tech has really no nuclear physics program to speak of. However, as an undergraduate, one studies physics, and not some sort of specialization in physics. So what's important is a solid base on which to build.
 
Goalie33 said:
Sorry, let me clarify: FRIB (the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams) will be the best nuclear facility at a university in the US.

Also, take a look at this:
http://grad-schools.usnews.rankings...e-schools/top-physics-schools/nuclear-science

This is going off-topic, but you really shouldn't be using such terms. The graduate school ranking does NOT rank facilities. FRIB isn't built yet. Furthermore, RHIC and the JLab accelerators (all of which are nuclear physics facilities) are not ranked in such a thing because they are not at any given school. Michigan State being ranked that highly doesn't have anything to do with whether or not FRIB is the "best" nuclear facility in the US.

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K