Georgia Tech vs UMich for Nuclear Engineering Grad School

  • Thread starter Thread starter flamesniper
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decision between attending Georgia Tech and the University of Michigan (UMich) for a graduate program in nuclear engineering. UMich is ranked #1 in nuclear engineering, while Georgia Tech has a higher overall ranking but is less recognized in this specific field. Factors influencing the decision include the city environment, with Atlanta being perceived as more appealing, and financial incentives offered by Georgia Tech. Ultimately, both institutions are acknowledged as strong choices for nuclear engineering, with UMich having a notable reputation and alumni network.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear engineering principles
  • Familiarity with graduate school application processes
  • Knowledge of university rankings and their implications
  • Awareness of the cultural and social dynamics of college towns
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific nuclear engineering programs at UMich and Georgia Tech
  • Explore the impact of university rankings on career opportunities in nuclear engineering
  • Investigate the living conditions and cultural aspects of Ann Arbor versus Atlanta
  • Learn about career paths in nuclear non-proliferation and related fields
USEFUL FOR

Prospective graduate students in nuclear engineering, individuals evaluating university options, and anyone interested in the cultural and academic differences between Georgia Tech and UMich.

flamesniper
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I just got accepted for grad school in nuclear engineering in Georgia Tech and in UMich-Ann Arbor. I am wrestling with the decision where to go. UMich was ranked #1 in nuclear engineering, whereas GaTech is slightly higher in general overall ranking (not highly ranked in nuc eng). It seems to me Atlanta is the nicer city and Gatech seems more "engineering-esque". Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The girl/guy ratio at GT is 1/3. You might want to check out www.studentsreview.com for some insight about the school from students that are attending, or atleast have attended, those schools. Good luck with your decision.
 
U of M all the way, great school, great city, excellent reputation for engineering and huge alumni that might help when searching for a job.
 
Both are good schools for nuclear engineering!

In what particular area of nuclear engineering is one interested?
 
flamesniper said:
It seems to me Atlanta is the nicer city

Depends on your definition of "nicer," I suppose. :smile:

I went to grad school (physics) at U of M and very much enjoyed living in Ann Arbor for eight years. I've never lived in Atlanta but have visited it once or twice a year for the past fifteen years or so (easy driving distance for weekend trips). I personally would pick Ann Arbor again, but that might be because while I enjoy visiting big cities, I feel more at home in medium-sized to small ones.
 
You cannot get that "college town" feeling as much in atlanta, Ann Arbor is pretty much the definition of a college town, a really exciting and diverse culture and atmosphere.
 
Thanks for the feedback! I wanted to go to UMich, but Georgia threw a nice chunk of money my way, and since I'm an international student, I couldn't decline. I sold my soul ;)
I would like to pursue a career in nuclear non-proliferation (but from a more technical standpoint) - a hybrid of engineering and policy.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K