Georgia Tech vs UMich for Nuclear Engineering Grad School

  • Thread starter Thread starter flamesniper
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for choosing between graduate programs in nuclear engineering at Georgia Tech and the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor. Participants explore various factors influencing the decision, including school rankings, city environments, and personal preferences.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that UMich is ranked #1 in nuclear engineering, while Georgia Tech has a higher overall ranking but is not as strong in that specific field.
  • Another participant highlights the girl/guy ratio at Georgia Tech and suggests checking student reviews for insights.
  • A participant expresses a strong preference for UMich, citing its excellent reputation and alumni network as beneficial for job searching.
  • There is a question about the specific area of interest within nuclear engineering, indicating that different specializations may influence the decision.
  • One participant shares a personal preference for Ann Arbor over Atlanta, emphasizing the appeal of a medium-sized college town compared to a larger city.
  • Another participant agrees that Ann Arbor embodies the "college town" experience, offering a diverse culture and atmosphere.
  • The original poster mentions financial incentives from Georgia Tech and expresses a desire to pursue a career in nuclear non-proliferation, blending engineering with policy considerations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the merits of each university and city, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a clear consensus on which option is superior.

Contextual Notes

Participants' preferences are influenced by personal experiences and financial considerations, which may not apply universally. The discussion reflects subjective views on city environments and school reputations.

Who May Find This Useful

Prospective graduate students in nuclear engineering, individuals considering the cultural aspects of college towns versus larger cities, and those interested in the implications of financial aid on educational choices.

flamesniper
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I just got accepted for grad school in nuclear engineering in Georgia Tech and in UMich-Ann Arbor. I am wrestling with the decision where to go. UMich was ranked #1 in nuclear engineering, whereas GaTech is slightly higher in general overall ranking (not highly ranked in nuc eng). It seems to me Atlanta is the nicer city and Gatech seems more "engineering-esque". Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The girl/guy ratio at GT is 1/3. You might want to check out www.studentsreview.com for some insight about the school from students that are attending, or atleast have attended, those schools. Good luck with your decision.
 
U of M all the way, great school, great city, excellent reputation for engineering and huge alumni that might help when searching for a job.
 
Both are good schools for nuclear engineering!

In what particular area of nuclear engineering is one interested?
 
flamesniper said:
It seems to me Atlanta is the nicer city

Depends on your definition of "nicer," I suppose. :smile:

I went to grad school (physics) at U of M and very much enjoyed living in Ann Arbor for eight years. I've never lived in Atlanta but have visited it once or twice a year for the past fifteen years or so (easy driving distance for weekend trips). I personally would pick Ann Arbor again, but that might be because while I enjoy visiting big cities, I feel more at home in medium-sized to small ones.
 
You cannot get that "college town" feeling as much in atlanta, Ann Arbor is pretty much the definition of a college town, a really exciting and diverse culture and atmosphere.
 
Thanks for the feedback! I wanted to go to UMich, but Georgia threw a nice chunk of money my way, and since I'm an international student, I couldn't decline. I sold my soul ;)
I would like to pursue a career in nuclear non-proliferation (but from a more technical standpoint) - a hybrid of engineering and policy.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K