Geosynchronus Sattelite Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter bleedblue1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sattelite
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the average orbital radius of a geostationary satellite for a planet with a specified mass and rotation period. Participants are exploring gravitational equations and orbital mechanics in the context of satellite motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply gravitational formulas to derive the orbital radius, questioning each other's calculations and assumptions about the constants and units used. There are discussions about potential computational errors and the correct interpretation of the equations involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's calculations and suggesting areas where errors may have occurred. Some participants have indicated they have resolved their issues, while others continue to seek clarification on specific steps in the calculation process.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the importance of unit conversion, particularly converting hours to seconds, and ensuring proper use of parentheses in calculations. Participants are also navigating the constraints of homework submission limits.

bleedblue1234
Messages
108
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A satellite that stays over the same spot on a planet as it rotates is called a geostationary satellite. (Geostationary satellites must be positioned somewhere over the equator of the planet.) What is the average orbital radius of a geostationary satellite for a planet with a mass of 4.82 x 10^24 kilograms and a period of rotation of 14.0 hours?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



F = ma
Fg = GM1m2/r^2
Gm1m2/r^2 = m2(v^2/r)
GM1/r = V^2
GM1/r = (2(pi)/T)^2
GM1/r = 4(pi)^2r^2/T^2
GM1T^2/4(pi)^2 = r^3
r = approx 1.26E8 m

but i am getting it wrong
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like a computation error? I get a different answer using that same formula with those same numbers.
 
cepheid said:
Looks like a computation error? I get a different answer using that same formula with those same numbers.

its 10^24... see my post again i edited the question to include the ^

edit... i got 3.34E8 now...

nvm back to 1.26E8
 
Yeah, I assumed that's what it meant, but I still got a different answer from you.
 
cepheid said:
Yeah, I assumed that's what it meant, but I still got a different answer from you.

hrm so

(6.67E-11) * (4.82 x 10^24) * (14*60*60)^2
/
(4(pi)^2)

so doing the math i get approx
2.01E24 ish

then do the third square root of that to get r...
and i get 1.26E8
 
bleedblue1234 said:
hrm so

(6.67E-11) * (4.82 x 10^24) * (14*60*60)^2
/
(4(pi)^2)

so doing the math i get approx
2.01E24 ish


I get approx. 2.06e22.

bleedblue1234 said:
then do the third square root of that to get r...
and i get 1.26E8

Do you mean the cube root?

It looks like there could be at least two problems with your calculation...
 
cepheid said:
I get approx. 2.06e22.
Do you mean the cube root?

It looks like there could be at least two problems with your calculation...

yes... i meant the cube root

but i am doing the calculation right and i keep getting 2.014E24

(are you doing 14*60*60 to convert hours to seconds?)
 
  • #10
Yes, that's about what I got.
 
  • #11
cepheid said:
Yes, that's about what I got.

about or is... i have 1 submission to get it right... :-p

thanks

edit: nailed the problem, much thanks
 
  • #12

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K