Geosynchrously orbiting satellites

  • Thread starter gills
  • Start date
  • #1
116
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN][PLAIN]http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j64/mrbebu/Physics_orbit_problem.jpg [Broken]

Homework Equations



[tex]\frac{GMm}{R^{2}}[/tex]

v = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{GM}{R}}[/tex]

v = wR

The Attempt at a Solution



Am I correct in my methods and thinking?

R_g = Geosynchrous orbit from earth's center = 4.22 x 10[tex]^{7}[/tex]m
R_e = Radius of earth = 6.37 x 10[tex]^{6}[/tex]

velocity of geosynchrous orbits (same for both satelites) --->
v = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{GM}{R_g}}[/tex] = 3072 m/s

Then I decided to find the angular velocity to relate it with angular displacement--->
w = [tex]\frac{v}{R_g}[/tex] = 7.28 x 10[tex]^{-5}[/tex] rad/s

so 10 orbits in a geosynchrous orbit is 240 hours = 864000 seconds

The satellite that needs to catch up needs to complete 10.5 orbits in the same time.

10.5 orbits = 21[tex]\pi[/tex] radians ---> [tex]\bar{w}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{d\theta}{dt}[/tex] = 7.64 x 10[tex]^{-5}[/tex] rad/s

Ratio of the w's =
[tex]\frac{7.28 x 10^{-5}}{7.64 x 10^{-5}}[/tex] = 0.95

since w is inversely proportional to the radius, the satellite that needs to catch up will need to have a radius 0.95 times a geosynchrous one which --->

0.95 x 4.22 x 10[tex]^{7}[/tex] = 4.01 x 10[tex]^{7}[/tex] m from earth's center

But, i have a feeling that this is an incorrect assumption.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
116
0
I've done another way that is close to my previous answer, but i think is more accurate.

using v = [tex]\frac{2\pi r}{T}[/tex]

and substituting it in for v in--->

v[tex]^{2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{GM}{r}[/tex] ---> and that gives us --->

T[tex]^{2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{4\pi^{2}r^{3}}{GM}[/tex]

so using the geosync satellite, we know that one period, T, takes 24 hours = 86400 seconds. And one T = 2[tex]\pi[/tex]r traveled

But for the chasing satellite to catch the geo satellite in 10 orbits, it needs to travel and extra [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] orbit during the full 10 orbits which = [tex]\pi[/tex] radians.

so the chasing sat needs to cover an extra [tex]\frac{\pi}{10}[/tex] radians during the same 86400 second T. Therefore --->

2[tex]\pi[/tex] + [tex]\frac{\pi}{10}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{21\pi}{10}[/tex]

instead of [tex]\frac{2\pi r}{T}[/tex] , we use:

([tex]\frac{21\pi r}{10T}[/tex][tex])^{2}[/tex] (squaring the whole expression) = [tex]\frac{GM}{r}[/tex]

Then solving for r = [tex]\sqrt[3]{\frac{100T^{2}GM}{441\pi^{2}}}[/tex]

which = 4.09 * 10[tex]^{7}[/tex] meters from center of earth.

I'm thinking this is the right answer
 
Last edited:
  • #3
D H
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
15,415
687
Good so far, but you still haven't answered the problem. How much lower is this orbit than a geosynchronous orbit?
 
  • #4
116
0
Good so far, but you still haven't answered the problem. How much lower is this orbit than a geosynchronous orbit?
T
I'm not worried about that part. That's the easy part:wink: I'm worried about the actual radius i got for the new orbit. Good so far i guess means that it is correct. Which are you refering to, first solution or second?
 
  • #5
Doc Al
Mentor
45,188
1,521

Homework Equations



[tex]\frac{GMm}{R^{2}}[/tex]

v = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{GM}{R}}[/tex]

v = wR
OK, but now express R in terms of [itex]\omega[/itex]:

[tex]R^3 = \frac{G M}{\omega^2}[/tex]

so 10 orbits in a geosynchrous orbit is 240 hours = 864000 seconds
OK. Interpreting the problem as 10 geosynchronous orbits (it could also be 10 orbits of the faster satellite), I'd write it as:
[tex]\omega_g T = 10(2\pi) = 20 \pi[/tex]

The satellite that needs to catch up needs to complete 10.5 orbits in the same time.
I'd write that as:
[tex](\omega_1 - \omega_g)T = \pi[/tex]

10.5 orbits = 21[tex]\pi[/tex] radians ---> [tex]\bar{w}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{d\theta}{dt}[/tex] = 7.64 x 10[tex]^{-5}[/tex] rad/s

Ratio of the w's =
[tex]\frac{7.28 x 10^{-5}}{7.64 x 10^{-5}}[/tex] = 0.95
By combining the two previous equations, I'd view that as:
[tex]20\omega_1 = 21\omega_g[/tex]

since w is inversely proportional to the radius, the satellite that needs to catch up will need to have a radius 0.95 times a geosynchrous one which --->
There's the problem with this solution: [itex]\omega[/itex] is not inversely proportional to the radius.
 
  • #6
D H
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
15,415
687
Good so far i guess means that it is correct. Which are you refering to, first solution or second?

The second answer is correct. As Doc Al noted in the previous post, the first solution erroneously assumes "w is inversely proportional to the radius". The correct relationship is Kepler's third law,

[tex]r \sim T^{2/3}[/tex]

You can linearize this relationship as

[tex]\frac {\Delta r}{r} \approx \frac 2 3 \frac {\Delta T}{T}[/tex]

Thus decreasing the period by 1/21st (note well: not by 1/20th) of the original period corresponds to roughly a 1340 kilometer decrease in orbital radius at geosynchronous altitude. This is a lot closer to the correct value than the 2100 kilometers you obtained for your first solution. It's still not correct, as the approximation is just that -- an approximation.
 

Related Threads on Geosynchrously orbiting satellites

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
4K
Top