Get my second bachelor's or go for Phd?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the decision of pursuing an engineering PhD versus obtaining a second bachelor's degree in engineering, following graduation with a double major in mathematics and computer science. The individual expresses a strong interest in working in the space industry, particularly with companies like SpaceX. They note that while a PhD is feasible and could provide funding opportunities, a second bachelor's degree would fill knowledge gaps and potentially offer a more secure path to employment in engineering. Participants suggest that the commercial space industry may favor candidates with practical engineering skills over theoretical knowledge, recommending direct inquiries to industry employers for clarity on their preferences.
EternusVia
Messages
92
Reaction score
10
Hi all,

I've asked for a lot of academic guidance before, so thanks for all the advice up to this point and going forward.

Here's the background: I'll be graduating this coming May with a double major in mathematics and computer science. My true passion tends to lie with engineering and physics, however. I would love to work as an engineer in the space industry (e.g., SpaceX).

Here's my question: Should I go for an engineering PhD, or should I go back and get a second bachelor's in engineering?

Here are the details:
Getting the engineering PhD is feasible. I've talked to a few schools and they will take you, although you have to take prerequisite courses. Other schools say they won't take you because you lack too many courses. On the other hand, getting a second bachelor's degree would prepare me well and fill in all the gaps. After the second bachelor's, I could go for a master's or PhD (provided I'm not living on crumbs at that point).

The PhD route keeps my momentum and at least gives me a chance at getting funding, thus ostensibly reducing cost. The bachelor's route raises my cost but provides what I see as a more secure route towards a job in engineering.

What are your thoughts?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Only a guess, but I think it likely that commercial space industry might prefer candidates with a well established engineering skill to a brilliant theoretician.
The simplest way to find out is contact them directly and just to ask them what they are looking for.
 
rootone said:
Only a guess, but I think it likely that commercial space industry might prefer candidates with a well established engineering skill to a brilliant theoretician.
The simplest way to find out is contact them directly and just to ask them what they are looking for.

That's probably true.
 
Hi all, Hope you are doing well. I'm a current grad student in applied geophysics and will finish my PhD in about 2 years (previously did a HBSc in Physics, did research in exp. quantum optics). I chose my current field because of its practicality and its clear connection to industry, not out of passion (a clear mistake). I notice that a lot of people (colleagues) switch to different subfields of physics once they graduate and enter post docs. But 95% of these cases fall into either of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K