Getting the argand with De Moires theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomas49th
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Argand Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the fourth root of the complex number z = 2 + 5i using De Moivre's Theorem. The argument of z is calculated as arctan(5/2) ≈ 1.1902 radians. To determine the fourth root that lies in the second quadrant, the angle must satisfy the condition θ > π/2, leading to the conclusion that k must be greater than 0. The calculated angle for k = 1 results in approximately 107°. The discussion also addresses the confusion regarding the conditions for k in relation to the second quadrant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representation on the Argand diagram
  • Familiarity with De Moivre's Theorem
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their oscillation
  • Basic skills in solving inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of De Moivre's Theorem in finding roots of complex numbers
  • Learn about the properties of the Argand diagram and how to determine quadrants
  • Explore the relationship between trigonometric functions and complex numbers
  • Practice solving inequalities involving angles and periodic functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in complex analysis and trigonometric applications in solving equations.

thomas49th
Messages
645
Reaction score
0
Hi just did an interesting question which made me wonder about solving it another way around

z = 2 + 5i
find the value of [/tex]z^{\frac{1}{4}}[/tex] which lies in the second quadrant of the Argand diagram and enter it's argument


So [tex]arctan(5/2) \approx 1.1902[/tex]

We use De Moivre's Thereom and the the oscillation of the trigonometric functions
[tex]\sqrt{29}(cos(\frac{1.1902 + 2k\pi}{4}) + isin(\frac{1.1902 + 2k\pi}{4}))<br /> <br /> So to lie in the second quadrant the angle must be [tex]\theta > \frac{\pi}{2}[/tex] <br /> [tex]\theta > \frac{ \pi}{2}[/tex]<br /> [tex]\frac{1.1902 + 2k\pi}{4} > \frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]<br /> <br /> so k > 0.8 so k > 0 (where k is an integer)<br /> <br /> The next integer after 0 is 1! So sub k = 1 into [tex]\frac{1.1902 + 2\pi}{4}[/tex]<br /> <br /> then convert to degrees 107° agreed?<br /> <br /> <b>BUT how come if we say:</b><br /> To lie in the second quadrant [tex]\theta < \pi[/tex]<br /> <br /> [tex]\frac{1.1902 + 2k\pi}{4} < \pi[/tex]<br /> solves k < 2.8 so if where an integer k can take the ranges 1 to 2.<br /> <br /> BUT if we put 2 in:<br /> [tex]\frac{1.1902 + 4\pi}{4}[/tex] this is greater than [tex]\pi[/tex]<br /> <br /> Thanks<br /> Thomas[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thomas49th said:
To lie in the second quadrant [tex]\theta < \pi[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1.1902 + 2k\pi}{4} < \pi[/tex]
solves k < 2.8

No it doesn't, try solving this inequality again, and show your steps if you get the same result.
 
im an idiot :blushing:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K