Giant human like 30 to 90 ft tall possible or not

  • Thread starter Thread starter anas101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of giant humans, specifically those 30 to 90 feet tall, and concludes that such size is impossible under current physiological conditions. The square-cube law, articulated by Galileo, dictates that as size increases, volume grows faster than surface area, leading to insufficient oxygen absorption and structural integrity issues. Participants emphasize that evolutionary adaptations would be necessary for any organism to support such size, ultimately rendering a giant human unrecognizable as human. Additionally, claims of historical giant humans lack scientific validation and are often linked to creationist narratives.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the square-cube law and its implications on biology
  • Basic knowledge of human physiology, particularly lung capacity and bone structure
  • Familiarity with evolutionary biology and adaptations
  • Awareness of the scientific method and the importance of empirical evidence
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the square-cube law and its applications in biological sciences
  • Study human physiology, focusing on respiratory and skeletal systems
  • Explore evolutionary adaptations in large animals, such as dinosaurs and elephants
  • Investigate the scientific validity of claims regarding giant humans and related artifacts
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for biologists, evolutionary scientists, educators addressing misconceptions about size in biology, and anyone interested in the intersection of science and mythology regarding human size.

  • #61
jarednjames said:
The somebody who claimed it was you. I can quote the post if you want. You must back up that claim or it is worthless - the link with it is not a valid reference. I am challenging it now.

Well, may be this link will be little more reliable to you than the previous link:

"[URL almost as fast as speed of sound
----By Dr. Terry Gaff[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #62
crowbird2 said:
Well, may be this link will be little more reliable to you than the previous link:

"[URL almost as fast as speed of sound
----By Dr. Terry Gaff[/URL]

Nope, that doesn't cut it.

The only mention of it in the article is the following:
Studies estimate the air speed of a sneeze up to around 85 percent of the speed of sound.

It doesn't back up your claim, only restate it. It has no link to the source materials that make that claim.

In fact, despite the title of the article, it doesn't discuss the speed of a sneeze aside from the above quote. It talks about why sneezes occur and when some people sneeze, moving on to germs spreading.

I suggest you look at the forum guidelines for an idea of what constitutes valid evidence.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #63
This has gone on long enough.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
17K