Giant Molecules: What's the Largest Known Molecule?

  • Thread starter Thread starter meteor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecules
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the molecule with the highest number of atoms, with DNA initially suggested due to its complexity. However, participants clarify that while DNA is composed of millions of atoms, larger structures exist. Diamonds and other carbon forms, classified as macromolecules, are mentioned but debated regarding their classification as true molecules. The conversation highlights that crystals, including salts and metals, can form vast structures, complicating the definition of a molecule. A key point is that according to the standard definition, a molecule is the smallest particle retaining the substance's properties, which excludes large structures like diamonds from being classified as molecules. The discussion underscores the nuances in defining molecular size and structure in chemistry.
meteor
Messages
937
Reaction score
0
Which is the known molecule that is composed by the major number of atoms? DNA? I know that DNA is made of million of atoms
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Originally posted by meteor
Which is the known molecule that is composed by the major number of atoms? DNA? I know that DNA is made of million of atoms

If you mean the biggest, diamonds are really just real big molecules - called macromolecular. I think a few other forms of carbon may qualify as well.
 
I am thinking that all crystals qualify as macromolecular structures. Does anyone know if this is correct?
 
Yes, I know, and, no, it is incorrect.
 
Ivan, I think the implications were covalently bonded molecules. I can get a crystal of sugar, but the sugar molecules are relatively small, compared to diamonds or graphite, and not bound to each other with much more than van der Waal forces. If you include ionic bonds, then the sky is the limit, since salts can form gigantic crystals. Metals form another interesting question in terms of if they are or aren't molecules, since most have an outer electron or so that are, sort of, community property.

Even diamonds and graphite don't really fall into the book definition of molecule (and be considered largest).

With a definition of:
compliments of Miriam-Websters online Dictionary
the smallest particle of a substance that retains all the properties of the substance and is composed of one or more atoms.

Then a large diamond wouldn't be considered a molecule.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by radagast
Ivan, I think the implications were covalently bonded molecules. I can get a crystal of sugar, but the sugar molecules are relatively small, compared to diamonds or graphite, and not bound to each other with much more than van der Waal forces. If you include ionic bonds, then the sky is the limit, since salts can form gigantic crystals. Metals form another interesting question in terms of if they are or aren't molecules, since most have an outer electron or so that are, sort of, community property.

Even diamonds and graphite don't really fall into the book definition of molecule (and be considered largest).

With a definition of:


Then a large diamond wouldn't be considered a molecule.

I know I've seen another definition in college but I can't find it in the old class book. Good enough.:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
748
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K