Gibbs Free Energy Correction Term

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter laser1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Gibbs
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
laser1
Messages
170
Reaction score
23
TL;DR
##dG## has correction term ##T-T_0##, can't find information on it.
By definition, we have that ##G=H-TS##, which means that ##dG=dU+PdV+VdP-TdS-SdT##, and at constant temperature and pressure, ##dG=dU+PdV-TdS##. As ##dU=TdS-PdV##, I asked my lecturer why ##dG=0## isn't true for all processes at constant temperature and pressure.

He then tells me that there is actually a correction term ##(T-T_0)dS##. So in reality, ##dG=dU+P_0dV-TdS+(T-T_0)dS=dU+P_0dV-T_0dS##, where I also substituted in ##P=P_0## (which is always true for constant pressure), where the ##0## quantities denote the properties of the surroundings.

However, I cannot find any information about this mysterious ##(T-T_0)dS## term. Would anyone be able to provide any insight on this? Thanks!
 
on Phys.org
[tex]dG=Vdp-SdT=0[/tex]
for dp=dT=0 with dN=0 as you derived.
laser1 said:
TL;DR Summary: ##dG## has correction term ##T-T_0##, can't find information on it.

why dG=0 isn't true for all processes at constant temperature and pressure.
Please let me share counter examples you find.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: laser1
anuttarasammyak said:
[tex]dG=Vdp-SdT=0[/tex]
for dp=dT=0 with dN=0 as you derived.

Please let me share counter examples you find.
I don't understand what you mean in relation to my question.
 
laser1 said:
TL;DR Summary: ##dG## has correction term ##T-T_0##, can't find information on it.

By definition, we have that ##G=H-TS##, which means that ##dG=dU+PdV+VdP-TdS-SdT##, and at constant temperature and pressure, ##dG=dU+PdV-TdS##. As ##dU=TdS-PdV##, I asked my lecturer why ##dG=0## isn't true for all processes at constant temperature and pressure.

He then tells me that there is actually a correction term ##(T-T_0)dS##. So in reality, ##dG=dU+P_0dV-TdS+(T-T_0)dS=dU+P_0dV-T_0dS##, where I also substituted in ##P=P_0## (which is always true for constant pressure), where the ##0## quantities denote the properties of the surroundings.

However, I cannot find any information about this mysterious ##(T-T_0)dS## term. Would anyone be able to provide any insight on this? Thanks!
I've never seen anything like that "correction term" before. Please ask you professor where it came from.

G is a state function, and it's changes are independent of the specific process that took the material from equilibrium state 1 to equilibrium state 2.

More generally, if there are changes in composition of the system (due to adding or removing or reacting chemical species to the system), the equation for dG is: $$dG=-SdT+VdP+\mu_1dN_1 +\mu_2dN_2...$$where the ##\mu's## are the chemical potentials of the various species.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: laser1 and Lord Jestocost
Chestermiller said:
I've never seen anything like that "correction term" before. Please ask you professor where it came from.
I asked him a few weeks ago and he said it's due to "irreversible work", but I will ask him again sometime next week when I see him.
 
laser1 said:
I asked him a few weeks ago and he said it's due to "irreversible work", but I will ask him again sometime next week when I see him.
This makes no sense to me. The change in G between two end states is independent of the path whether reversible or reversible.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord Jestocost