Gibbs Free Energy in Superconductors

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
taishizhiqiu
Messages
61
Reaction score
4
When reading some material concerning Ginzburg-Landau theory of superconductors, I got the following sentence:

The appropriate thermodynamic potential for describing a superconductor in an applied magnetic field is the Gibbs free energy ##G## (natural variable ##H##) and not the Helmholtz free energy ##F## (natural variable ##B##).

I don't understand the sentence. In gas, Gibbs free energy is minimal in constant temperature and pressure. Does this sentence mean that in superconductors Gibbs free energy is minimal in constant ##T## and ##H##? I can't make sense out of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
L&L discuss quite extensively their peferred thermodynamic variables in the case of magnetic fields in previous chapters.
 
DrDu said:
L&L discuss quite extensively their peferred thermodynamic variables in the case of magnetic fields in previous chapters.
You mean Landau and Lifshitz‘s textbook?
 
Sorry, yes, I had erroneously in mind that you had mentioned Landau & Lifshitz. The relevant pair of variables in case of magnetism is not p and V but B and H and you can analogously define energies and enthalpies with different natural variables.
I think that thermodynamics in the presence of fields is quite a non-trivial matter. Much of the distiction whether B or H are to be preferred depend on the measurement you have in mind and on the chosen separation into system and surrounding, especially, which part of the field belongs where.