MHB Given sequences, finding the relation

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93
Problem:
Define $a_n=(1^2+2^2+ . . . +n^2)^n$ and $b_n=n^n(n!)^2$. Recall $n!$ is the product of the first n natural numbers. Then,

(A)$a_n < b_n$ for all $n > 1$
(B)$a_n > b_n$ for all $n > 1$
(C)$a_n = b_n$ for infinitely many n
(D)None of the above

Attempt:
The given sequence $a_n$ can be written as
$$a_n=\frac{n^n(n+1)^n(2n+1)^n}{6^n}$$
But I am not sure what to do now. I understand that this is a very less attempt towards the given problem but I really have no clue how someone should go about comparing these kind of sequences. Please give a few hints.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Start by comparing $$a_2$$ and $b_2$ this will eliminate one of the first two inequalities . Then proceed by induction.
 
ZaidAlyafey said:
Start by comparing $$a_2$$ and $b_2$ this will eliminate one of the first two inequalities . Then proceed by induction.

Thanks ZaidAlyafey but I seem to have figured out a better solution. Use of AM-GM inequality gives the answer in a few seconds. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top