A Global vs. Local (gauge) Symmetry

paralleltransport
Messages
128
Reaction score
97
TL;DR Summary
Let's pick a good definition of gauge "symmetry"
Gauge symmetry is highly confusing, partly because many definitions differ in the literature. Strictly speaking gauge symmetry should be called gauge redundancy since you are mapping multiple representations to the same physical state.

What is your favourite definition of what "large" gauge vs. "smaller" gauge transformations are?
What subtle points do you know about the distinction between a global vs. a local gauge transformation is (any examples)?

I'm polling because I have seen conflicting definitions in the literature.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd never call a global symmetry gauge symmetry, because that's indeed confusing. A gauge "symmetry" is indeed exactly defined as you write in your first paragraph, and to call it "gauge redundancy" would be a much more accurate choice of terminology (it implies also that local gauge symmetries cannot be spontaneously broken, which is known as Elitzur's theorem; it's rather the "Higgs mechanism" than spontaneous symmetry breaking).

A very nice and pedagogical paper on these issues the following in connection with superconductivity and electromagnetic gauge symmetry:

https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0503400
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2005.03.008
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and paralleltransport
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top