A Global vs. Local (gauge) Symmetry

Click For Summary
Gauge symmetry often leads to confusion due to varying definitions in literature, with a preference for referring to it as gauge redundancy, as it maps multiple representations to the same physical state. The distinction between global and local gauge transformations is crucial, with the former not being classified as gauge symmetry to avoid confusion. Local gauge symmetries cannot be spontaneously broken, a point supported by Elitzur's theorem, contrasting with the Higgs mechanism. The discussion highlights the importance of clear terminology and understanding the implications of gauge transformations in theoretical physics. A recommended paper connects these concepts to superconductivity and electromagnetic gauge symmetry.
paralleltransport
Messages
128
Reaction score
97
TL;DR
Let's pick a good definition of gauge "symmetry"
Gauge symmetry is highly confusing, partly because many definitions differ in the literature. Strictly speaking gauge symmetry should be called gauge redundancy since you are mapping multiple representations to the same physical state.

What is your favourite definition of what "large" gauge vs. "smaller" gauge transformations are?
What subtle points do you know about the distinction between a global vs. a local gauge transformation is (any examples)?

I'm polling because I have seen conflicting definitions in the literature.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd never call a global symmetry gauge symmetry, because that's indeed confusing. A gauge "symmetry" is indeed exactly defined as you write in your first paragraph, and to call it "gauge redundancy" would be a much more accurate choice of terminology (it implies also that local gauge symmetries cannot be spontaneously broken, which is known as Elitzur's theorem; it's rather the "Higgs mechanism" than spontaneous symmetry breaking).

A very nice and pedagogical paper on these issues the following in connection with superconductivity and electromagnetic gauge symmetry:

https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0503400
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2005.03.008
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and paralleltransport
Theoretical physicist C.N. Yang died at the age of 103 years on October 18, 2025. He is the Yang in Yang-Mills theory, which he and his collaborators devised in 1953, which is a generic quantum field theory that is used by scientists to study amplitudes (i.e. vector probabilities) that are foundational in all Standard Model processes and most quantum gravity theories. He also won a Nobel prize in 1957 for his work on CP violation. (I didn't see the post in General Discussions at PF on his...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K