Global vs. Local (gauge) Symmetry

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinction between global and local gauge symmetries, emphasizing that gauge symmetry should be referred to as gauge redundancy due to the mapping of multiple representations to the same physical state. Participants agree that global symmetries should not be classified as gauge symmetries, as this leads to confusion. The conversation highlights Elitzur's theorem, which states that local gauge symmetries cannot be spontaneously broken, and contrasts this with the Higgs mechanism. A recommended paper on these topics is provided for further reading.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gauge theory terminology
  • Familiarity with Elitzur's theorem
  • Knowledge of the Higgs mechanism
  • Basic concepts of superconductivity and electromagnetic gauge symmetry
NEXT STEPS
  • Read the paper "A Pedagogical Introduction to Gauge Symmetry" available at arXiv:cond-mat/0503400
  • Study the implications of Elitzur's theorem in quantum field theory
  • Explore the Higgs mechanism and its role in particle physics
  • Investigate the differences between global and local symmetries in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, students of quantum field theory, and researchers interested in gauge symmetries and their applications in particle physics and superconductivity.

paralleltransport
Messages
128
Reaction score
97
TL;DR
Let's pick a good definition of gauge "symmetry"
Gauge symmetry is highly confusing, partly because many definitions differ in the literature. Strictly speaking gauge symmetry should be called gauge redundancy since you are mapping multiple representations to the same physical state.

What is your favourite definition of what "large" gauge vs. "smaller" gauge transformations are?
What subtle points do you know about the distinction between a global vs. a local gauge transformation is (any examples)?

I'm polling because I have seen conflicting definitions in the literature.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd never call a global symmetry gauge symmetry, because that's indeed confusing. A gauge "symmetry" is indeed exactly defined as you write in your first paragraph, and to call it "gauge redundancy" would be a much more accurate choice of terminology (it implies also that local gauge symmetries cannot be spontaneously broken, which is known as Elitzur's theorem; it's rather the "Higgs mechanism" than spontaneous symmetry breaking).

A very nice and pedagogical paper on these issues the following in connection with superconductivity and electromagnetic gauge symmetry:

https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0503400
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2005.03.008
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and paralleltransport

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K