GM tube and dual probe scintillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the efficiency of GM tube and dual probe scintillator detectors when measuring radioactive sources, specifically C-14, a pure beta emitter. It concludes that a single decay event does not register as two counts due to the "dead time" of GM counters, which can last up to 200 microseconds, preventing the detection of subsequent particles emitted in rapid succession. Additionally, low-energy beta particles, such as those from C-14, are harder to detect, necessitating the use of liquid scintillation detectors or gas flow counters with appropriate window specifications for optimal efficiency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of GM counters and their operational principles
  • Knowledge of scintillation detectors and their detection mechanisms
  • Familiarity with radioactive decay processes and particle emissions
  • Awareness of detector efficiency and dead time concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "liquid scintillation detectors" for low-energy beta detection techniques
  • Explore "gas flow counters" and their advantages over traditional GM counters
  • Study "dead time" effects in radiation detection and how to mitigate them
  • Investigate "C-14 detection methods" and their applications in various fields
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for radiation detection specialists, nuclear physicists, and anyone involved in the measurement of radioactive materials, particularly those working with low-energy beta emitters like C-14.

jacob1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Recently I measured a range of sources with two detectors comparing their efficiency. One of the sources used (C-14) was a pure beta emitter and it made me wonder. If a radioactive source decays by beta then gamma, will one decay register as two counts as two radioactive particles are produced. The results showed a relatively low efficiency for the C-14 on both detectors but could this just be down to the low energy beta being harder to detect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jacob1 said:
If a radioactive source decays by beta then gamma, will one decay register as two counts as two radioactive particles are produced
In general no. There are at least two reasons for this, one particular to GM counters is that when an event is registered the detector is "dead" for a certain amount of time. It is unable to register another event until the present ionization is cleared from the chamber. The length of time to clear the ionization can be as much as 200 microseconds. If particles come in faster than one every 2x10-4 second the subsequent arriving particles will not be registered. Multiple radiations emitted from a decay are usually very fast.

The other reason and this is more applicable to scintillation detectors or solid-state detectors since the dead times are very short is that the radiation may not be emitted in the solid angle that the detector subtends although it is more likely you will register multiple radiations per decay.

jacob1 said:
The results showed a relatively low efficiency for the C-14 on both detectors but could this just be down to the low energy beta being harder to detect.
Yes. Typically the window of the detector for betas of energy less than 250 Kev should have an areal density of about 5 mg/cm2 or less. Very low-energy Betas are most easily detected with liquid scintillation detectors or gas flow counters which are windowless.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb and jacob1
jacob1 said:
One of the sources used (C-14) was a pure beta emitter
I'm really surprised. C-14 is not a commonly used source, as it is more trouble than it's worth. The beta is low energy, the activity is low (and thus the cost is high), you need to protect against biological uptake, etc. I don't even see it in the usual catalogs for academic sources.

Nothing is a pure beta emitter. The particles exit the source, ionize the material surrounding it (or the detector, like the tube) and as the electrons repopulate those atoms you get x-rays. But as @gleem points out, multiple pluses that happen in the same time window register as a single pulse.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jacob1 and dlgoff

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K