Automotive GM Volt / Vauxhall Ampera and series hyrbrid cars

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the efficiency and practicality of series hybrid cars like the GM Volt and Vauxhall Ampera, which utilize an engine as a generator to charge a battery that powers the motor. While the Ampera claims impressive fuel efficiency of 175 mpg, questions arise about why such vehicles are not more widespread, with concerns about costs and potential conspiracies mentioned. The efficiency of using the engine solely as a generator is debated, with the argument that it allows the engine to operate at optimal speeds. Retrofitting existing cars with this technology is questioned, particularly regarding the feasibility of achieving sufficient battery power for initial movement and starting the engine. Overall, while series hybrids offer advantages in urban settings through regenerative braking, they may be less efficient on highways compared to conventional vehicles.
hakko
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Volt

In this series hybrid, engine and generator charge the battery and battery powers the motor, and can be made with components already available. The Ampera is claimed to do 175mpg (vs 40mpg on my current car). So I wonder why there aren't more cars like this already? Conspiracy?

Is it really more efficient to use the engine as a generator to power a battery which powers a motor? Can someone show some numbers on this?

If it is efficient, can this system be easily retrofitted on cars? Not like the Ampera/Volt where it can run from battery alone for 30+ miles, but enough battery to get the car moving and get the starter motor of the engine/generator going?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hakko said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Volt

... So I wonder why there aren't more cars like this already? Conspiracy?
How about expense? I recently saw a Chevy S-10 pickup which had been converted to electric. Owner said it cost over $8k to do the conversion. Electrics are expensive.

Is it really more efficient to use the engine as a generator to power a battery which powers a motor? Can someone show some numbers on this?

If it is efficient, can this system be easily retrofitted on cars? Not like the Ampera/Volt where it can run from battery alone for 30+ miles, but enough battery to get the car moving and get the starter motor of the engine/generator going?

Where you gain is that the ICE can be set to run at it's most efficient speed, rather then constantly changing speed as when being used to control the speed of the car.
 
If it is efficient, can this system be easily retrofitted on cars?

It was popular back in 70's. People liked the Opels.

"Mother Earth News" magazine had many articles back then, probably they could be found online.
Here's a fellow who sells electric motors for EV hobyists.
http://www.ddmotorsystems.com/ElectricVehicles.php
 
The advantage of a series hybrid is that you can plug it in and go the first few miles on electric only, after that they are less efficient then a conventional drivetrain on the highway. Compare a Chevy Volt with a Cruze Eco. On gas only the Volt gets 37 mpg on the highway but the Cruze gets 42.

Regenerative braking will give any hybrid a decided advantage in town, weather it be a series hybrid, parallel hybrid, or a Two-mode.
 
My idea is that I want to use immerse Whitetail Antlers in a fishtank to measure their volumetric displacement (the Boone and Crockett system is the current record measurement standard to place in a juxtaposition with) I would use some sight glass plumbed into the side of the tank to get the change in height so that I can multiply by the tank cross-section. Simple Idea. But... Is there a simple mechanical way to amplify the height in the sight glass to increase measurement precision...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
13K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K