Gods Lego, what are the chances?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rcbs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chances Lego
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the universe and the properties of fundamental particles, particularly in the context of the Big Bang and the concept of a "fine-tuned universe." Participants explore whether the existence of matter and its properties can be attributed to chance, the many worlds interpretation, or other theoretical frameworks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express wonder at the idea that the Big Bang produced particles with properties that allow for the creation of matter, questioning the likelihood of this occurrence.
  • Others suggest that the existence of only one universe limits our understanding, proposing that other universes could have different properties that might also seem interesting from their own perspectives.
  • A participant mentions the many worlds interpretation, noting that it may not be widely accepted in the physics community, while expressing personal agreement with the theory.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of energy conservation in the context of many universes being created.
  • One participant references Hawking's idea of universes being born continuously, raising questions about evidence for such claims.
  • A suggestion is made to watch a documentary that covers related topics, including the properties of spacetime.
  • A participant introduces the concept of a "fine-tuned universe," providing a link for further information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of the universe or the implications of the Big Bang. Multiple competing views are presented, particularly regarding the many worlds interpretation and the concept of a fine-tuned universe.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of the universe and the implications of the Big Bang are not fully explored, and there are unresolved questions regarding the evidence for the existence of multiple universes.

Rcbs
Messages
13
Reaction score
2
Not sure if this is the right category but...

Protons, electrons and neutrons, the perfect building blocks for matter. How does physics explain that of all the things that could explode out of the Big Bang, we got the perfect Lego blocks for creation? Is there a point of view on this? Is it the many worlds interpretation? Is it the simple answer that had they not we would not be here to reflect on it? If so is that really an explanation?

Be interested to hear your thoughts :-)



Professional animator and not physicist.

Rcbs.
 
Space news on Phys.org
All I can say is that we don't know. We can only assume, and this far, the Big Bang has made the most sense to me. The fact is that nobody is right or wrong at this moment. It's like Schrödinger's Cat.
 
Thanks Joseph.

Seems likely that the Big Bang happened. Just seems incredible ot me that of all the things that it could have produced, it produced particles which just happen to have unimaginable properties that perfectly create matter. The chances seem incalculable. Do we just say chance?
 
So you say that it is incredible that our universe has so many interesting properties (such as being able to create matter).

This is true. But the point is that we only know about one universe. Maybe other universes also have (very different) interesting properties? And if you were to live in that universe (in some form), then you woulg think that that universe is the only possible one that is so interesting.
 
Absolutely micromass. So we are assuming many worlds? I was always under the impression that that theory was not widely liked by the physics community. I personally have no issues with it and agree it would explain a lot. Just seems like an incredible waste of energy creating trillions of universes for every possible potential. How does that fit in with conservation of energy?
 
According to Hawking, there may be universes being born all the time. Some of them survive, and some don't.
 
Interesting Joseph, I wonder if there is any evidence for this, either indirect or mathematical?
 
You should watch "Into the Universe" with Steven Hawking. It covers this topic and a bunch of others like aliens and the properties of spacetime.
 

Similar threads

Graduate After Big Bang: Are There Different Universe Building Blocks?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Undergrad Did Wheeler consider Carter's anthropic multiverse?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
High School Why is the redshift not the result of something else
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Graduate Nature and The Universe, How can Nature being conscious, know what it is doing ?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate Is delayed choice remote entanglement of photons derived from TDSE?
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Graduate "The 7 Strangest Coincidences in the Laws of Nature" (S. Hossenfelder)
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
Graduate In light of new evidence, what might be behind the Casimir Effect?
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Admissions Could I please get critique on my SOP? (Experimental Biophysics)
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Graduate Did Moses Predict the Big Bang Theory?
  • · Replies 126 ·
5
Replies
126
Views
20K
Philosophy: Is God timeless? (NOT A RELIGION THREAD)
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K