A high GHz mobile signal needs to be close to your house for you to get a good signal without the mast frying nearby residents with too many watts. A LW radio signal on the other hand can be transmitted from a far away country with a less watts. This is because shorter wave lengths are absorbed more by obstacles like walls. So if there's lots of dust between you and the light from a star in a far off galaxy would not this dust absorb more of the shorter wave lengths leaving more of a redness the further you look. Another explanation that could cause further away galaxies to be more red would be the degrading of high frequency light over time and space towards red. Does high frequency light get more absorbed by dust I suspect it does. Does high frequency light degrade over space and time I suspect it does. Another explanation is that black holes could distort far of light causing it to warp and become longer in it's wave length. Another explanation is that super massive black holes in the center of galaxies could cause very slight warps relative to extra dimensions over the whole of space causing the light from stars to appear to be getting further and further away. Yet Another explanation could be that light sources are interfering with each other causing the general light further away to shift to the red. Hell there could be loads of neutron stars distorting light such that it shifts to the red. In fact thinking about it I can't think of many static universe types where there wouldn't be a redshift of some sort the further out you looked. If you ask me the big bang theory is mostly blind belief backed by a nation who is obsessed with bombs where claiming that the ultimate super bomb created the universe is too lovely an idea to be wrong. Maybe Science isn't full of religious nutters mapping more concentric circles to patch up the wrong idea but just maybe it is. Having a beginning to everything or a completeness to everything like in string theory does allow people to assume we are living somewhere divine which may have a creator but such thought may never be actually truly mathematically reflecting properly whats actually there. Am I mistaken is there more evidence than redshift and redshift like effects if so what is this evidence and where might I read about it. Personally my theory is one that works with large extra dimensional space and lower dimensional spacial convergence at small scales in a universe that is never perfectly of any spacial integer dimension range. Apparently recently someone even found evidence of large extra dimensional space but I may be wrong and just because one large extra dimensional space model is proven wrong doesn't automatically make them all wrong like many have claimed. So whats your view are you pretty certain the big bang is real and what evidence is backing your view or do you think something else is going on, whats your view and whats your evidence. Is infact the best solution one that utilities multiple theories like We use Relativity and Quantum Mechanics today for optimal solutions.