Going to Cornell Next year and need some class advice (Physics Major)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around course selection for a physics major at Cornell, specifically whether to skip introductory courses based on prior AP exam performance. Participants explore the implications of taking higher-level classes versus foundational courses, considering both academic rigor and social aspects of the freshman experience.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about whether to skip the introductory physics course, suggesting that if there is doubt, it may be better not to skip it.
  • Another participant argues that the freshman class offers a valuable social experience and the opportunity to meet fellow physics majors.
  • Some participants assert that AP classes do not match the rigor of college-level courses, recommending that the original poster take the introductory courses instead.
  • There is a suggestion that taking a more advanced calculus class, such as Calculus III, could be beneficial, but some participants caution that linear algebra should precede it for better understanding.
  • Several participants mention that special relativity can be included in introductory courses, noting that while the mathematics may not be complex, the concepts can be challenging.
  • One participant shares their experience of having special relativity included in their introductory mechanics course, indicating that this is not uncommon.
  • Another participant expresses concern about the potential pitfalls of relying solely on AP classes for college readiness, advising the original poster to consider retaking foundational courses.
  • The original poster indicates a decision to take the honors introductory course based on the feedback received.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on whether skipping the introductory courses is advisable. Some advocate for taking the honors course for a solid foundation, while others suggest that prior AP performance may justify skipping. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to course selection.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of confidence in their preparedness for advanced courses based on their AP exam scores, but there is no consensus on the appropriateness of skipping introductory courses. Concerns about the rigor of AP classes and their alignment with college expectations are also noted.

Who May Find This Useful

Incoming physics majors at Cornell or similar institutions, students considering course placement based on AP exam performance, and those interested in the social dynamics of introductory courses in STEM fields.

nealh149
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
Yeah, so I don't know how difficult I should take classes.

I have a 5 on Phys Mechanics and E&M AP tests, as well as a 4 on the BC Calc Test (5 AB Subscore). These can get me the highest possible placements.

Do you think I should place into a 200 level class in Physics, or should I stick with Honors Mechanics and Special Relativity (which is a single course). I was looking at some Problem Sets in this course, and they looked pretty difficult, so I don't know.

For Math, I can place into Calculus III (which I believe is multivariable Calc) or I can take Linear Algebra and possible a Diff Equations course, I'm not positive.

So any advice would be great. Thank You.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're questioning whether skipping the first year course is a good idea, you probably shouldn't skip it.

At any rate, the freshman class will be a good social experience and you will meet the other physics majors that you will be studying with for the rest of your degree.
 
special relativity is in an intro course? wow you're lucky. take the intro courses. the ap classes aren't nearly as rigorous as intro physics class is at a good school like cornell. i guess you're comfortable with integral and differential calculus and integration methods and series and sequences so you're skipping calc 1 and 2 ? i don't know if that's a good idea or bad idea because i never took the calc ap classes but again college classes>ap classes. calc 3 and linear algebra and diff eq are pretty much all on the same level so you can take them however you choose, even all 3 at the same time probably wouldn't be too bad of an idea.
 
If you want a more solid foundation in calculus take an analysis class later on instead of retaking calc 1 and 2. Linear algebra should come before calc 3 if you want to understand what's going on.
 
ice109 said:
special relativity is in an intro course? wow you're lucky.
Special relativity can be incorporated into many introductory courses since it needs no higher level maths-- the concepts are far harder to grasp than the mathematics. I had SR tagged onto the end of my intro mechanics course, since I guess they thought it was important enough for everyone to have a slight grasp of. However, it isn't until later on that many people are given a rigorous course in SR, utilising lagrangian/hamiltonian mechanics and introducing tensors, in a way to prepare for GR courses.
 
Yeah the special relativity is just tacked on like cristo said. Otherwise it's a pretty standard mechanics course for freshman, just more demanding. I think I'll take that and linear algebra. I'm pretty comfortable with differential and integral calculus, not so much series, but I can learn that independently.
 
nealh149 said:
Yeah the special relativity is just tacked on like cristo said. Otherwise it's a pretty standard mechanics course for freshman, just more demanding. I think I'll take that and linear algebra. I'm pretty comfortable with differential and integral calculus, not so much series, but I can learn that independently.

Going by this syllabus [in .ps format]
http://www.lns.cornell.edu/~maxim/P116/Spring2005/handout1.ps
using Kleppner and Kolenkow isn't (for most places) standard at that level [unfortunately].
It is, as you say, more demanding.

(I didn't like parts of the KK chapters on special relativity at the end. You may wish to consult parts of Taylor and Wheeler http://www.eftaylor.com/download.html#special_relativity instead.
For a different approach, you might like to consult some old class notes by Mermin at http://www.lassp.cornell.edu/~cew2/P209/P209_home.html )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
oedipa maas said:
If you're questioning whether skipping the first year course is a good idea, you probably shouldn't skip it.

At any rate, the freshman class will be a good social experience and you will meet the other physics majors that you will be studying with for the rest of your degree.

agree with you completely
 
Don't skip the intro courses. Even if you find them easy, they'll be nice refresher courses, in which you can get some easy A's or A-'s if you know them well enough. If you end up not knowing the material as well as you thought...well, your in the right class then. Also, as others said, you'll get to meet others in your year and socialize.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
cristo said:
Special relativity can be incorporated into many introductory courses since it needs no higher level maths-- the concepts are far harder to grasp than the mathematics. I had SR tagged onto the end of my intro mechanics course, since I guess they thought it was important enough for everyone to have a slight grasp of. However, it isn't until later on that many people are given a rigorous course in SR, utilising lagrangian/hamiltonian mechanics and introducing tensors, in a way to prepare for GR courses.

i understand that it can be, I am just saying it's cool that it is that way in his class. here the only special relativity stuff in the SR/GR senior class
 
  • #11
Thanks guys, I'm definitely taking the intro honors course..
 
  • #12
nealh149 said:
Thanks guys, I'm definitely taking the intro honors course..

Cool! Good luck to you in the future!
 
  • #13
i'd have loved to have taken the honors sequence at cornell. ah well.


glad to hear you'll be doing the kleppner/purcell sequence. not a whole lot of schools provide that, afaik.
 
  • #14
I hate how High school sets some kids up to failwith AP classes. Not saying you will fail, but as a TA I can say I have seen so many kids get 5's on ap exams come to college, try and take the next class after tha exam's placement, take the 2nd class 2x, only having to go back and take the 1st one over again, then having to take that second class a 3rd time.I wish you the best. But even at Cornell and you sounding very bright, id rather you take Mechanics and E & M again.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Thanks, Llama, that's what I plan on doing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K