Good books to learn electronic devices and circuits AND digital electronics

  • Thread starter Thread starter shivajikobardan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Circuits
AI Thread Summary
Recommended books for learning electronic devices, circuits, and digital electronics for competitive exams include "Electronic Devices and Circuits" by JB Gupta and "Digital Electronics" by William H. Gothmann. Sedra/Smith's "Microelectronic Circuits" is popular but may not be ideal for beginners, while Dorf's "Introduction to Electric Circuits" is noted for its clarity on resistive op-amp configurations. For semiconductor physics, Ben Streetman's book is suggested, with Pierret as a supplementary option. Overall, having physical books with good exercises is emphasized for effective learning and reference.
shivajikobardan
Messages
637
Reaction score
54
TL;DR Summary: Good books to learn electronic devices and circuits AND digital electronics for competitive exams

Here are my choices(in no particular order). You can recommend something out of this as well.

1) Electronic Devices and Circuits by JB Gupta.
2) Electrronic Principles by albert malvino, david j bates, patrick e hoppe
3) Electronic devices and circuit theory by boylestad and nashelsky
4) microelectronic circuits by sedra smith
5) Op-amps and linear integrated circuits by ramakant a. gayakwad

1) Digital Electronics by william h. gothmann
2) digital logic and computer organization by v.rajaraman, t.radhakrishnan
3) digital fundamentals by thomas. l floyd
4) digital logic design by mansaf alam, bashir alam
5) digital logic and microprocessor design with vhdl by enoch o hwang
6) digital design by m.morris mano and michael d.ciletti
7) digital logic and computer deisng by m. morris mano
8) digital systems design by charles h roth jr, lizy kurion john

Purpose of buying these books:

1) To prepare for comptitive exams.
2) To have a good book as reference whenever I want to learn something. Having a book physically means a lot.
3) Have good exercises that can help me brainstorm and understand the concepts. More is always not better but there should be enough.

PS: Books like the art of electronics are out of scope. I generally don't like morris mano's books, idk why. That's all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's your background? Will this be your first time doing circuit analysis?

Sedra/Smith is very popular I've seen it on almost everybody's shelf (at least within my circle), but it doesn't seem too great for introductory circuit analysis. The book I started with was Introduction to Electric Circuits by Dorf; I also felt like it had a good section on resistive op-amp configurations like inverter and differencer, which I then learned more about active filters in Sedra/Smith. Sedra/Smith was really good with the non-linear stuff like adding diodes and transistors in. Sedra/Smith is also a huge book you will want to cherry-pick the the chapters that are important for your exam.

By the way: When you say devices... not sure if it's just me... it makes me think you are talking about semiconductor physics. If that's something of interest to you, then I would recommend Ben Streetman's book. Pierret is also a classic, but I felt like for me it's hard to follow (still a good supplement and the book is much cheaper probably due to age). Sedra/Smith will briefly cover it, but not really in depth.

I only ever took one digital circuits class (outside of one that focused on Verilog) it covered things like NAND, MUX, encoders/decodes, flip-flops... so I don't feel too confident recommending a book, but the book we used was Logic and Computer Design Fundamentals by Mano and Kime. This book might be outdated it has lots of k-maps and that was very popular material for exams, but I don't think I've ever seen it outside of the classroom. It does appear to me that whatever I learned (the other material covering digital logic) in that class using that book holds up well during interviews, during an internship, and brief conversations with coworkers, but I don't work on too much digital circuits in my current career. If you need to understand digital circuits down to the IC design, then I followed CMOS by Baker. I wouldn't recommend Baker unless you really have to deep dive into IC design, but it is a good book and I see that one on a lot of shelves too including my own.

I spent years on this material so if your exam is coming up soon, then I think my above recommendation probably wont fit within your schedule.
 
I'm a graduate of ECE. I've a decent background of circuits but I'm no expert at it. I'm a noob-intermediate at these stuffs. Not my first time doing circuit analysis. I can take this exam at any time I wish. So, I am not in a hurry.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Back
Top