Google Street View: How Long Are Updates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Google Street View updates occur approximately every three months, as evidenced by a user's observation of a recent image upload that took about three months to appear in the database. The discussion highlights concerns regarding privacy, particularly how Google blurs faces and vehicle details to comply with legal regulations. Users also speculate on the implications of Google Street View in criminal cases, where image timestamps could potentially affect legal outcomes. Additionally, the conversation touches on the accidental collection of unencrypted data from home networks by Google vehicles, which led to fines and privacy concerns.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Google Street View technology and its operation.
  • Familiarity with privacy regulations affecting image capture and data collection.
  • Knowledge of the implications of digital evidence in legal contexts.
  • Awareness of the history and development of Google’s mapping services.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Google Street View update frequency and image capture technology.
  • Explore privacy laws related to digital imaging and data collection.
  • Investigate the legal implications of using Google Street View images as evidence in court.
  • Learn about the technical aspects of how Google blurs faces and license plates in images.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for legal professionals, privacy advocates, technology enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the implications of digital mapping technologies on privacy and law enforcement.

jtbell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2025 Award
Messages
16,027
Reaction score
7,848
As I was walking back to my office from lunch a few days ago, along one of the main streets in my town, I saw a car approaching, with a 3-foot stalk sprouting out of the roof, and a blue ball with several apertures on top of that. It passed me, and I saw a sign on the side reading "Google [something]".

I wonder how long it takes for Google to update its Street View database. :smile: The current images for that street are dated March 2009.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org


I've been wondering about this phenomenon since I first became aware of it.

I just googled London, for example, zoomed in on the Waterloo bridge, and followed it partway across, seeing many pedestrians on the way. Most of their faces are too fuzzy to identify, but many could, possibly, be identified by distinct clothing.

At some point I wonder if the outcome of some criminal case won't depend on placing someone, or their car, somewhere, because the google cam happened to be in the neighborhood around the time of the crime.

A suspect's guilt could be thrown in serious doubt if google's image shows his car to have been miles away from the crime, or his guilt could be cinched if he claims he was far away, but google shows he was actually parked around the corner from the crime.
 


I believe someone was allegedly caught cheating on their spouse because their vehicle was caught by google outside their lovers place or something along those lines.
 


I once saw the Google car coming and stood waving with a friend, we saw it a little while later and did the same. After a year the footage finally went up...and we weren't in it :frown: we were cut between two series of pictures it seemed.
 


What would happen if the google car were traveling in a high traffic area and could only drive at a speed of approx 3 miles per hour for about a mile. Could you then walk for jog beside it and be in every google map picture frame for that mile? That would be strange and awesome.
 


Jimmy Snyder said:
According to that map they haven't viewed my street yet. So I can continue to fool around. No wait, they viewed my girlfriend's street. Yikes, that's my wife's car! I'll see you later guys. I got to run.
:smile:
 


Also, as hardware on/in the roaming Google cars records current street views it's possibly recording unencrypted data from wireless home computers.

(I got this from an issue of The Week magazine, and have no idea if it's true.)
 
  • #10


TheStatutoryApe said:
I believe someone was allegedly caught cheating on their spouse because their vehicle was caught by google outside their lovers place or something along those lines.
That was reported last year or a couple of years ago. I believe that is one reason that details of vehicles and people are blurred or removed.

Interestingly, Google photographed the house where I lived with my folks more than 50 years ago on the south coast of Vic, Aus. It is a small town, with a population of about 1800, but when I lived there, there was probably 200-300 people.

Why they photographed that place and not other more populated places seems rather strange.
 
  • #11


That was reported last year or a couple of years ago. I believe that is one reason that details of vehicles and people are blurred or removed.
How do they specify what they'll blur out?
 
  • #12
Last edited:
  • #13


ThomasT said:
Also, as hardware on/in the roaming Google cars records current street views it's possibly recording unencrypted data from wireless home computers.

(I got this from an issue of The Week magazine, and have no idea if it's true.)

Google claimed that the data from home computers was collected accidentally and paid a fine.

http://techland.time.com/2011/03/21/google-fined-142000-for-collecting-private-data/
 
  • #14


Google has some driverless cars on the road in nevada. The are still required to have two people in the vehicles.

http://www.doubleclickblog.com/nevada-becomes-first-us-state-to-allow-googles-driverless-cars-on-roads/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=nevada-becomes-first-us-state-to-allow-googles-driverless-cars-on-roads
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15


edward said:
Google claimed that the data from home computers was collected accidentally and paid a fine.
Ah yes, the old "that 25 terabytes of data was collected accidentally" defense. As I recall the fine was something like $25k. That's like a day's coffee money for Google. I suspect that they might still be doing what they got fined for. Not that it's being done with any sort of bad or necessarily intrusive intentions.
 
  • #16


I've seen that Google street-view privacy page, so I was expecting that if my face could have been recognizable, they'd blur it. I probably look like most any other slightly overweight gray-haired guy in a baseball-type cap anyway. But I was the only person on that stretch of sidewalk for at least a block in either direction, and I was carrying a rolled-up umbrella, so if I'm in there at all, I'll know it.
 
  • #17


I love Google street view. I recently toured the neighborhood where I grew up. It looks exactly the same as I remember it from 50 years ago ... except for the houses that aren't there any more because of the interstate highway.
 
  • #18


ThomasT said:
I love Google street view. I recently toured the neighborhood where I grew up. It looks exactly the same as I remember it from 50 years ago ... except for the houses that aren't there any more because of the interstate highway.
The second house I lived in had been demolished and a parking lot was built in its place. :frown:

The third house used to look out on open fields. It now has a major freeway running past it.
 
  • #19


You have to admit, the idea of "hey, let's drive down every road in the world (practically) panoramically photographing the whole thing and meshing it into google maps" sounded a bit far fetched back in 2007.
 
  • #21
jtbell said:
As I was walking back to my office from lunch a few days ago, along one of the main streets in my town, I saw a car approaching, with a 3-foot stalk sprouting out of the roof, and a blue ball with several apertures on top of that. It passed me, and I saw a sign on the side reading "Google [something]".

It saw me:

attachment.php?attachmentid=50200&stc=1&d=1345986178.jpg


I don't remember the last time I previously checked Google Street View unsuccessfully, but it was probably about a bit over a month ago. So it took about three months for this image to go into their database.
 

Attachments

  • google.jpg
    google.jpg
    44.1 KB · Views: 537
Last edited:
  • #22

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K