GR vs SR: Reconciling Contravariant & Covariant Vector Components

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
nigelscott
Messages
133
Reaction score
4
I am trying to reconcile the definition of contravariant and covariant
components of a vector between Special Relativity and General Relativity.

In GR I understand the difference is defined by the way that the vector
components transform under a change in coordinate systems.

In SR it seems that it is more of a notational thing that allows for the
derivation of the invariant interval.

How are the 2 things related?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a source for the different treatment in SR? It can be made to look like it's just a notational thing in SR by using Minkowski coordinates where ##g_{\mu\rho}=g^{\mu\rho}## so many of the differences between contravariant and covariant components disappear - but that's just taking advantage of the fact that flat spacetime is an especially nice special case (which is why we call it "special" relativity).

It's a good exercise to choose some perverse coordinate transform in which the metric acquires off-diagonal and non-constant components even in flat space-time, work a few otherwise-easy problems in those coordinates, just so that you can see the machinery working. You'll find that the contra/co distinction appears even in SR.
 
OK, soon after I posted I realized that the connection is through the metric tensor.