Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around identifying suitable graduate programs in the US for biological sciences, with a focus on areas such as biochemistry, biotechnology, immunology, microbiology, and pathobiology. Participants explore options for international students, particularly from Canada, and consider factors such as program quality, funding, and research opportunities.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- One participant seeks recommendations for US graduate programs in biological sciences, emphasizing interest in international student acceptance.
- Another participant questions whether the original poster is only interested in US universities or if they are open to other international options.
- Several participants suggest using resources like gradschools.com and US News rankings to find programs, but note these do not provide insights into program quality or funding.
- One participant highlights the importance of researching specific topics and journals to identify well-funded programs and faculty involved in relevant research.
- There is a suggestion that narrowing down research interests could help in selecting appropriate programs, as many universities offer a wide range of options.
- A participant mentions that only US citizens are eligible for certain funding sources, which may affect the original poster's options.
- The original poster expresses uncertainty about their research interests, particularly in cancer research, and questions whether they are behind in their academic exploration.
- Another participant recommends gaining laboratory experience as an undergraduate to strengthen graduate school applications and build relationships with faculty.
- There is mention of the competitive nature of cancer research programs and the interdisciplinary approach of many graduate programs in this field.
- Participants discuss potential job opportunities for those with a bachelor's degree in cell and molecular biology, including positions in biotech and pharmaceutical companies.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express various viewpoints on the best approach to selecting graduate programs and the importance of research experience. There is no consensus on specific programs or strategies, and the discussion remains open-ended regarding the best paths forward for the original poster.
Contextual Notes
Participants note the importance of funding availability and the competitive nature of certain research fields, particularly cancer research. The discussion reflects a range of experiences and uncertainties regarding academic and career paths in the biological sciences.