Grammar (ref index/indexes/indices) and appendix quesrtion

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackcat
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the correct terminology for measuring the refractive index of multiple liquids. The consensus is that "refractive indices" is the appropriate plural form when referring to more than one liquid. Participants also discuss the structure of appendices in academic writing, agreeing that multiple appendices (e.g., Appendix 1 for URLs, Appendix 2 for tables, and Appendix 3 for graphs) enhance clarity for the reader. The use of "indexes" versus "indices" is debated, with a preference for "indices" noted, particularly in a scientific context. Overall, clarity and correctness in terminology and structure are emphasized.
blackcat
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
hi,

1) when i have more than 1 liquid, do i say "I'm going to measure the refractive index of these liquids. These liquids' refractive indexes..." or "..refractive indexes.." or "refractive indices of these liquids"?

2)

If i have to write an appendix, is it standard to do for example, appendix 1 for a list of URLS, appendix 2 for table of results and 3 for graphs or something?

or is it just 1 appendix?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some say "they aren't using their brains" and some say "they aren't using their brain". But one could say "they have brains but aren't using them" but could probably not say "they have a brain but aren't using it", although one could say "they each have a brain but aren't using it". I think this other use is a case where the word 'each' has been dropped, but it is probably incorrect.

So I think it would either be "... the refractive index of each liquid" or "... the refractive indexes/indices of the liquids". I think this second use is called 'plural quantification', but I couldn't tell you more about it.
 
Last edited:
I'd say go with multiple appendices. Appendix 1, Appendix 2, etc. Separate appendices would be clearer for the reader.

I'd also say go with the "refractive indices of the liquids are measured in this experiment" or "The refractive index of each liquid is shown in Table Z" I think "indices" is the best for plural use. I've never heard of using "indexes"... but it could be because I'm a dumb American, maybe the English think differently. :rolleyes:
 
blackcat said:
hi,

1) when i have more than 1 liquid, do i say "I'm going to measure the refractive index of these liquids. These liquids' refractive indexes..." or "..refractive indexes.." or "refractive indices of these liquids"?
"...these liquids' refractive indices..." is correct, and so is "...the refractive indices of these liquids.".
 
THANK YOU

I'll stick with refractive indicies!
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K