Graphical Impulse calculation from the graph of force verus time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating impulse from a force versus time graph. The user initially attempted to find impulse by calculating the area under the graph but struggled due to the shape not being a simple triangle. They then tried using the formula J = F(t - t0) but were confused about determining the force values. Participants suggested breaking the area into simpler shapes to facilitate calculation and emphasized the importance of using proper units. The conversation highlights the challenges of dealing with non-constant forces in impulse calculations.
yesmale4
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Shown below is a graph of the x-component of the force as a function of time FYP, x(t) that you exert on a particle of mass 18 kg.
FYP, x(t) = 0 at t = 18.095 s.
The particle starts at t = 10 s with an initial x-component of its velocity of 6.420 m/s and moves under the influence of only the force shown in the graph.

What is the x-component of the impulse that you give to the particle from t = 10.00 s until t = 33.00 s.
Relevant Equations
J=F*(t-t0)
area of triangle
area of rectangle
d.png


hello i would like to get some help with this problem.
At first it try to calculate the impulse by the area but i found it too difficult
Then i try to solve it by the forumla J= F(t-t0), but the problem is that i don't know what F is so i try to solve it like this
F10) = 8
F(33) = -13
so
EF = 8+-13 = -5
T = 33 -10 = 23
F = 23 * -5 = -115
and it wrong so i would like to know what I am supposed to do here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yesmale4 said:
EF = 8+-13 = -5
What do you think you have calculated there?
How did you try to do it by graph area? Describe the steps.
 
haruspex said:
What do you think you have calculated there?
How did you try to do it by graph area? Describe the steps.
about the first question i was thinking that because impulse formula is J=F*(t-t0) and the force isn't constant then if i calculate the change in the force and multiply it by the change of time it will be alright
about the second question i was not able to calculate the area between t = 12 to t= 28 because i don't undertand what kind of shpe it is , its not triangle so that's why i try diffrent method
 
yesmale4 said:
i was thinking that because impulse formula is J=F*(t-t0) and the force isn't constant then if i calculate the change in the force and multiply it by the change of time it will be alright
If a car drove at one speed for a while, slowed down to a different speed, then drove at that speed for a while, would you find the distance traveled by multiplying the change in speed by the time taken?
What if you were to increase the speed by 1m/s at all stages? You would calculate the same number. What if you increased the time at the higher speed and reduced the time at the lower speed by the same? Again, you would calculate the same number.
yesmale4 said:
i was not able to calculate the area between t = 12 to t= 28 because i don't undertand what kind of shpe it is , its not triangle
So cut it into simpler shapes.
 
From t=10 s to t = 12 s the force is constant: F = 8 N
Can you do that part of the exercise ?

And: please use units

##\ ##
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top