Graphing Parametric Equations: Solving for t^2, t^4, and t^6

  • Thread starter Thread starter nameVoid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parametric
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around graphing parametric equations, specifically the functions defined as (t^2, t^4, t^6). Participants are exploring how to visualize these equations in three-dimensional space and questioning the nature of the resulting graph.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the function representation and the challenges in visualizing the graph. There are questions about the correct interpretation of the parametric equations and whether they represent a curve or a surface. Some suggest using specific plotting commands in software like Mathematica, while others express confusion about the dimensionality of the graph.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing various interpretations of the equations and attempting to clarify the nature of the graph. Some guidance has been offered regarding plotting techniques, but there is no consensus on the correct approach or interpretation yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework requirements, which may limit the methods they can use to explore the problem. There is also uncertainty regarding the range of t values to be used for plotting.

nameVoid
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
t^2,t^4,t^6

Trying to graph this

I have the traces
x=y^2 for x>=0 in xy
Also x=z^3 for z>=0 in xz
And z=y^(3/2) for y>=0 in yz

Parametricplot3d in mathematics does nothing to get a picture for this graph and drawing is proofing difficult
In general what is the best way to plot these when it's not obvious plug in for t?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not clear what you are trying to do.

Is your function f(x,y,z) = (t^2, t^4, t^6) perhaps? Or something else?
 
Yes that is the function of x y z
I am trying to graph it
 
SteamKing said:
It's not clear what you are trying to do.

Is your function f(x,y,z) = (t^2, t^4, t^6) perhaps? Or something else?
I think you mean, vectorially, r(t) = (t^2, t^4, t^6), i.e. x = t^2 etc..
But from the OP,
x=y^2 for x>=0 in xy
Also x=z^3 for z>=0 in xz
suggests r(t) = (t^6, t^4, t^2).
what is the best way to plot these when it's not obvious plug in for t?
It depends what range of t you want to sketch it for.
It's kind of hard to sketch 3D curves. What exactly have you been asked to do?
 
Sketch the curve
mathematica doesn't help
 
Last edited:
The book asks for a sketch I assume there is a reasonable way
Plot t values?
 
Is this what you are looking for?
Code:
ParametricPlot3D[{t^2, t^4, t^6}, {t, 0, 1}]
If it isn't then perhaps you can explain what is incorrect about that.
 
Is gives a line I am under the impression that the graph is a surface
What's throwing me off is the book taking the trace in each plane
Sint,cost,t cylinder along z
 
nameVoid said:
Is gives a line I am under the impression that the graph is a surface
What's throwing me off is the book taking the trace in each plane
Sint,cost,t cylinder along z

No: the point-set you describe is a one-dimensional object = a curve in 3d. If you wanted a surface you would need two independent variables, so you would need to have something like three functions x(u,v), y(u,v), z(u,v) in two variables u and v.
 
  • #10
In cost,sint,t
z for all real isn't a cylinder?
 
  • #11
nameVoid said:
In cost,sint,t z for all real isn't a cylinder?

Nope.

Code:
ParametricPlot3D[{Cos[t], Sin[t], t}, {t, 0, 4 Pi}]

It is perhaps difficult to get a really good 3D view of it, but try from different angles and guess what it is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K