Graphing Velocity vs Time for a Falling Rope

  • Thread starter Thread starter knightpraetor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rope Velocity
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on graphing velocity versus time for a falling rope, specifically when one end is released. The user is trying to derive a function relating position and time through integration of given equations for velocity and acceleration. There is uncertainty about how to graph these relationships using Maple, particularly how to express velocity as a function of time rather than position. Participants suggest that Maple has tools for plotting differential equations and recommend using its help functions for guidance. Overall, the challenge lies in solving the second-order differential equations to obtain the desired velocity-time graph.
knightpraetor
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
SO i basically need to know what the graph of velocity vs time is..and I'm supposed ot do this numerically using maple...though if anyone has some basic intuition about what the graph should look like, even that would be nice.

Anyways, I'm unsure of how to graph it

Basically i have x_dot^2 = \frac {g(2bx-x^2)}{b-x} and that
x_doubledot = g + \frac {g(2bx-x^2)}{2(b-x)^2}

and i thought i could just integrate the first one and get a function relating x and t, and then use that in the second equation to get an equation for velocity in terms of just time...because otherwise how am i supposed to graph it.

Anyways, for those who are wondering this graph of velocity vs time is supposed to represent a simple physical problem of a rope whose ends are attached to two ends A and B on a ceiling..and then B is cut loose and allowed to fall. So i thought the greatest acceleration would occur at the beginning and decrease as more tension occurs in the rope during the later portions with a rapid falloff in velocity at the end.

ANyways, thoughts or ideas would be nice..not really sure what to do

ps- xdot = velocity and x double dot = acceleration
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Huh? What is dot and double dot supposed to be, a first and second time derivative?

It looks to me like they are first and second order autonomous differential equations. What is the problem with using Maple to graph them? Maple, I haven't really used it much, is supposed to have a really good differential plotter. If that is the part you are having trouble with, you could probably use Maple's help functions and figure it out.
 
yeah, dots are derivatives with respect to time..but which function do i integrate to get velocity? i mean i can integrate the second one (acceleration ) to get velocity, but even then, it's in terms of x rather than time..i want velocity versus time so how do i go about getting that
 
If you solved the second differential with respect to time you would get your velocity as a function of time and x, unless that is given to you. That looks like it is pretty crappy to solve by hand, so I don't know what the solution is, but Maple should be able to do it.

Looks like you have a second order differential of the form
\frac{d^2 x}{dt^2}+\frac{a_1}{a_2} \frac{dx}{dt} + {a_o}x = f(x)
Some kind of vibration? I don't know, differentials are ugly.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
472
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K