I have a more philosophical question about the interpretation of a mathematical process.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

We have a chiral superscalarfield shown as partiell Grassmann Integral and transform it into a lagrange.

where S and P are real components of a complex scalarfield and D and G are real componentfields of F.

It is a supersymmetric Transformation and covariant. Every Lorentz transformation is supersymmetric and covariant. genius so far.

In the Grassmann equation is not a kinetic term and is only build now with a kinetic term through the lagrangian supersymmetric transformation.

So if we work with Grassmann only and only think in Grassmann mathematic, then we have a complete different view on the world. We have a masseless world. But if we try to make it matching and kommensurable for our QT World, then we have other properties as in origin.

We can interpretate it as SUSY or we can say that it is now the nature of the mathematic.

What are you interpreting in this mathematical trick? It is more a philosophical question.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Grassmann Integral into Lagrange for scalar superfields

Loading...

Similar Threads - Grassmann Integral Lagrange | Date |
---|---|

A Time integral of worldsheet current | May 7, 2016 |

Order or Grassmann, vector fields and tensors | Oct 4, 2015 |

Integral operation | Mar 17, 2015 |

Grassmann integration | Oct 30, 2014 |

Grassmann variables and Weyl spinors | Feb 15, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**