Living_Dog
- 98
- 0
How does one show that dF = 0 is the geometric version of Maxwell's equations??
The discussion revolves around the geometric interpretation of Maxwell's equations, specifically focusing on the expression dF = 0. Participants explore how this expression relates to the electromagnetic fields and the implications of showing its frame independence.
Participants do not reach a consensus on how to show that dF = 0 is the geometric version of Maxwell's equations, and multiple competing views on the interpretation and implications of the equations remain present.
Some limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of forms and the need for further clarification on the relationship between geometric formulations and traditional Maxwell's equations.
Petr Mugver said:I guess you mean that dF is a 2-form in four dimensions, so it has six independent fields (the electromagnetic fields):
[tex]dF=E_idx^idt+\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}B_idx^jdx^k[/tex]
Now the homogeneous Maxwell equation read dF=0. For the other two equations, introduce a 3-form for the 4-current
[tex]J=J_1dx^1dx^2dt+J_2dx^3dx^4dt+J_3dx^1dx^2dt+\rho dx^1dx^2dx^3[/tex]
So the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations are dF = -4 \pi J. Note that, since d^2 = 0, J satisfies the continuity equation dJ = 0.
Petr Mugver said:I guess you mean that dF is a 2-form in four dimensions, so it has six independent fields (the electromagnetic fields):
[tex]dF=E_idx^idt+\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}B_idx^jdx^k[/tex]
Now the homogeneous Maxwell equation read dF=0. For the other two equations, introduce a 3-form for the 4-current
[tex]J=J_1dx^1dx^2dt+J_2dx^3dx^4dt+J_3dx^1dx^2dt+\rho dx^1dx^2dx^3[/tex]
So the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations are dF = -4 \pi J. Note that, since d^2 = 0, J satisfies the continuity equation dJ = 0.