Gravitational attraction problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle projected vertically upward from the Earth's surface, with the goal of proving a specific formula for the maximum height reached above the surface in relation to initial speed and gravitational forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss integrating gravitational attraction to find work done and relate it to kinetic energy. Some question the validity of their integration limits and assumptions about gravitational potential energy at different heights.

Discussion Status

There are multiple approaches being explored, including direct comparisons of potential and kinetic energy. Participants are questioning the assumptions made regarding gravitational potential at varying heights, indicating a productive exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of gravitational variation with height and how it affects their calculations, which may not align with the expected formula. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in integrating gravitational forces over height.

uha1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle is projected vertically upward from the Earth's surface with initial speed Vo. Prove that the maximun height H reached above the Earth's surface is H= Vo^2R/(2gR-Vo^2)






The Attempt at a Solution


R is the Earth's radius. If the gravitational attraction at the Earth's surface is mg, then the attraction at some height r above the surface will be mgR^2/(R+r)^2. The attraction can be integrated from r = 0 to r = H to get the total work involved, which must equal the kinetic energy mVo^2/2. HOWever, when we integral from
r=0 to r=H of mgR^2/(R+r)^2 and set it equal to mVo^2/2,
H= does not give the value Vo^2R/(2gR-Vo^2) ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's easier to use
final potential energy = initial kinetic energy.
 
Mentz114 said:
It's easier to use
final potential energy = initial kinetic energy.

If we do it that way, it gives us...


mv^2(1/2) = mgh

h= v^2*(1/2)/g

and it still doesn't satisfy the answer :eek:
 
You're assuming the potential is the same at R and R+h.
But they stand in the ratio R/(R+h)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K