Gravitational equipotential multiple choice problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around understanding gravitational fields and equipotential lines in the context of a multiple-choice homework question. Participants clarify that gravitational field strength is greater where equipotential lines are closest together, indicating a steeper potential gradient. The key takeaway is that the point of greatest gravitational field strength corresponds to the location of the lowest gravitational potential. This understanding is crucial for solving problems related to gravitational fields and equipotential surfaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational field strength and its relationship to mass and distance.
  • Familiarity with equipotential lines and their significance in gravitational fields.
  • Knowledge of potential gradients and their implications in physics.
  • Basic skills in interpreting topographical maps and gradients.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of gravitational potential and its mathematical representation.
  • Learn about the relationship between equipotential surfaces and gravitational field lines.
  • Explore examples of gravitational fields in different contexts, such as planetary bodies.
  • Investigate how to analyze topographical maps for steepness and elevation changes.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on gravitational fields and equipotential concepts, as well as educators seeking to clarify these topics for their students.

Grizzly_1
Messages
7
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
The diagram shows gravitational equipotential. Adjacent equipotential are separated by an equal gravitational potential difference V.

Which point has the greatest gravitational field strength?
Relevant Equations
E=-GM/(r^2)
Sillyquestion.jpg
Hello everyone, thank you for taking your time to read this. I was assigned a homework task of multiple choice questions to do with gravitational fields. This is one of the last questions and I have been pondering over it for some time now. I don't understand how any sort of answer is achievable.

To the best of my knowledge, gravitational field strength is directly proportional to the mass of the object that is causing the field, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the mass causing the field and the point at which you are determining field strength. In this case, as we do not know the location of the mass we cannot determine the direction of the field lines, and by extension we cannot tell if the potential differences are decreasing from D to A, or A to D.

If you knew which way the potential gradient was increasing, I think you could work out which point had the greatest gravitational field strength as it is the point at which potential is the least (most negative), as this implies it is closest to the mass or masses that are causing the field.

As you do not know this, I do not know how you could answer such a question, they are just arbitrarily placed about the square and I do not know the relevance of equipotentials, as these are just indications about lines that have an equal potential difference along its length, this doesn't tell us anything relevant to finding at which point the gravitational field is greatest.

So this is my reasoning so far, I am truly stumped. I hope someone can help out in solving this tricky question (or perhaps not tricky and I am just being silly).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
On a topographical map of terrain on the Earth, how can you tell the steepest parts from those that are flatter? :wink:
 
Does this help?
Screen Shot 2023-04-25 at 12.52.00 PM.png
 
kuruman said:
Does this help?
View attachment 325485
berkeman said:
On a topographical map of terrain on the Earth, how can you tell the steepest parts from those that are flatter? :wink:
Hello, thank you for responding. I understand both of your comments (I think), you are saying that, in the area were the equipotential lines are closest together, there must be a greater potential difference gradient, and therefore a greater field strength. I now understand, you have both helped me greatly. Thank you again!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and kuruman
Grizzly_1 said:
Hello, thank you for responding. I understand both of your comments (I think), you are saying that, in the area were the equipotential lines are closest together, there must be a greater potential difference gradient, and therefore a greater field strength. I now understand, you have both helped me greatly. Thank you again!
You got it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K