- #1

- 63

- 2

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter csmcmillion
- Start date

- #1

- 63

- 2

Physics news on Phys.org

- #2

Gold Member

- 5,126

- 19

Yes, that doesn't make sense. Are you sure that's what they meant?

- #3

- 63

- 2

Pengwuino said:Yes, that doesn't make sense. Are you sure that's what they meant?

Maybe not. The exact statement was "In an ordinary sense, electric charge is not energy, but gravitational charge is energy". So maybe I am misunderstanding the statement.

- #4

- 113

- 0

The energy of a gravitational field is associated with the force of attraction between masses, while the energy of an electric field is associated with the force of attraction or repulsion between charges.

This is because the energy of a gravitational field is proportional to the product of the masses and the distance between them, while the energy of an electric field is proportional to the product of the charges and the distance between them squared. This difference in the mathematical relationship results in the gravitational field having energy, while the electric field does not.

The energy of a gravitational field has a direct impact on the motion and behavior of objects within it. The greater the energy of the gravitational field, the stronger the force of attraction between objects and the faster they will accelerate towards each other.

At this time, there is no known way to harness the energy of a gravitational field for practical use. However, scientists continue to study and research ways to potentially utilize this energy in the future.

The energy of a gravitational field can be calculated using the formula E = -GmM/r, where G is the gravitational constant, m and M are the masses of the objects, and r is the distance between them. This formula is a simplified version and does not take into account other factors such as the shape and distribution of the masses.

Share:

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 692

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 31

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 17

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 49

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 21

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 6K