Gravitational field strength (ratios)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the height of a satellite above Earth's surface based on the gravitational field strength it experiences compared to that at Earth's surface. The subject area pertains to gravitational fields and ratios in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between gravitational field strength and distance from the center of Earth, questioning the original poster's setup and approach to using ratios. There is a suggestion to reconsider the proportionality of the distances involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct interpretation of the relationship between gravitational field strength and distance, noting that the original poster's method may have a flaw in the setup. There is an acknowledgment of the need to clarify the definition of distances involved in the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention that the distance rs refers to the distance from the satellite to the center of Earth, which may not align with the problem's requirement for height above the surface. This distinction is under discussion.

HerroFish
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 6.2*10^2-kg satellite above Earth's surface experiences a gravitational field strength of magnitude 4.5-N/kg. Knowing the gravitational field strength at Earth's surface and Earth's radius, how far above Earth's surface is the satellite? (Use ratio and proportion.)


Homework Equations



Fg = (GMm)/r2
g = GM/r2
gE = 9.8-N/Kg
rE = 6.37*10^6-m


The Attempt at a Solution



gs/gE = rs2/rE2
rs= √((rE2gs)/gE)

and my answer comes out to be 4.3*10^6-m. But the answer at the back of the book is 3.0*10^6-m, what did I do wrong? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The field strength is INVERSELY proportional to the square of the radius. So it should be

gs/gE = rE2/rs2

which is the reciprocal of what you had on the right hand side.

Think about it: for gs ,the rs is on the bottom, and for 1/gE, the rE is on top. It also makes intuitive sense. We know gs is smaller than gE, so the ratio should have the smaller distance on top.
 
Don't forget, also that rs is the distance between the satellite and the centre of its orbit, which is not quite what the problem is asking for.
 
ah that make sense, thanks for everything!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K