Gravitational Fields: Same or Different?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Shaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields Gravitational
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of gravitational fields, particularly whether the fields of large objects are indistinguishable in the absence of a sense of scale and time. Participants explore implications of Birkhoff's theorem and the behavior of test objects falling through these fields, considering both Newtonian mechanics and general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that in the absence of a sense of scale, the gravitational fields of large objects may appear indistinguishable.
  • One participant asserts that Birkhoff's theorem indicates the exterior field of a spherically symmetric object is uniform.
  • There is a suggestion that the time for a test object to fall through a gravitational field could be the same if the object is reduced to its Schwarzschild radius.
  • Another participant questions the logic behind the conclusion that all test objects will take the same time to reach the Schwarzschild radius, noting differences in falling speeds in weak versus strong fields.
  • Some argue that while a test object in a weak field falls more slowly, the greater distance in a strong field may balance the time taken to reach the Schwarzschild radius.
  • One participant mentions that a heavier object attracts faster, suggesting that with careful selection of starting distances, falling times could be equal across different gravitational fields.
  • A later reply indicates that while Birkhoff's theorem suggests uniformity, practical experiments with test masses from varying distances would yield different arrival times at the Schwarzschild radius.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether gravitational fields are truly indistinguishable without a sense of scale and time. There is no consensus on the implications of Birkhoff's theorem or the behavior of test objects in varying gravitational fields.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of gravitational interactions and the potential need for further calculations to clarify the relationships between mass, distance, and falling time in both Newtonian and relativistic contexts.

Shaw
Messages
46
Reaction score
3
In the absence of a sense of scale, will the gravitational fields of large objects be indistinguishable, one from the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, in the case of the exterior field of a spherically symmetric object. This is Birkhoff's theorem.
 
Can we therefore conclude that the amount of time needed for a test object (suitable to the size of the object) to fall through a gravitational field will be the same? This may require reducing the object to its Schwarzschild radius.
 
Shaw said:
In the absence of a sense of scale, will the gravitational fields of large objects be indistinguishable, one from the other?
Shaw said:
Can we therefore conclude that the amount of time needed for a test object (suitable to the size of the object) to fall through a gravitational field will be the same?
In the absence of a sense of time, it would take the same time.
But I'm not sure I follow your logic.
 
SlowThinker said:
In the absence of a sense of time, it would take the same time.
But I'm not sure I follow your logic.
A test object in a weak gravitational field will fall through the field to the Schwarzschild radius more slowly than a test object in a strong field, but an object in a strong field has further to fall. Intuitively, I think that it's a wash, and all appropriate test objects in all fields will take the same amount of time to reach the Schwarzschild radius. They all arrive at the radius at the same time.
 
Shaw said:
A test object in a weak gravitational field will fall through the field to the Schwarzschild radius more slowly than a test object in a strong field, but an object in a strong field has further to fall. Intuitively, I think that it's a wash, and all appropriate test objects in all fields will take the same amount of time to reach the Schwarzschild radius. They all arrive at the radius at the same time.
A gravitational field has no end. If you fall from a given distance, then a heavier object will attract you faster, and you'll have (a bit) shorter distance to fall.
If you carefully select the starting distance, the falling time will be the same. In Newtonian mechanics, you'd have to move 2x farther for an 8x heavier planet. In GR, it should be pretty close to the Newtonian result but I haven't done that calculation.
 
Thanks for this. I take it that this means that while Birkhoff's Theorum states that all gravitational fields look the same, when a sense of scale is missing we can tell one field from another by dropping test masses from, say, a point where the gravitational force is 1% of its value at the Schwarzschild radius, and the test masses will arrive at the radius at different times.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
964
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
7K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K