Gravitational Forces on three masses at the corners of an equilateral triangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter hasibx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the gravitational forces acting on three masses positioned at the corners of an equilateral triangle. The mathematical solution presented involves the vector rule, resulting in a force expression that includes a negative component, specifically (-\hat{j}). The question raised concerns the necessity of knowing the coordinate positions of the masses to understand why the negative sign is used. It is emphasized that without a clear definition of the coordinate system, the assumption of the direction of (-\hat{j}) may lead to confusion. Clarifying the positions of the masses in relation to the x-y coordinates is essential for accurate interpretation of the results.
hasibx
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Three identical masses m are kept at the vertices of equilateral triangle of side 'a'. Find the force on A due to B and C
Relevant Equations
F =\frac{Gm_{1}m_{2}}{r^2}
I solved the math using vector rule
R= \sqrt{F^2 +F^2 +2F^2cos\frac{\pi}{3}} =\sqrt{3}\frac{Gm^2}{a^2}
But the answer is showing: \sqrt{3}\frac{Gm^2}{a^2} (-\hat{j})

My question is:

Why is (-\hat{j}) added here? Why is it negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We would need to know the positions of the masses in terms of the coordinate system.
 
haruspex said:
We would need to know the positions of the masses in terms of the coordinate system.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot at Jul 15 16-02-01.png
    Screenshot at Jul 15 16-02-01.png
    33.6 KB · Views: 92
That's not what I asked for, but the given answer seems to be assuming that ##\hat j## is straight up the page in that diagram. If you were not told that then I do not see how you could be expected to get that answer.
 
@hasibx you do not seem to understand what it means to
haruspex said:
know the positions of the masses in terms of the coordinate system.
WHERE do the points sit relative to the x-y coordinates?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top