Gravitational potential energy and Kinetic Energy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between gravitational potential energy (Pe) and kinetic energy (Ke) in the context of orbital mechanics. Participants explore the transformation of energy types during orbital motion, the implications of orbits on energy conservation, and the conditions under which potential and kinetic energy change.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that potential energy transforms into kinetic energy as an object moves, particularly in the context of falling objects.
  • Others clarify that an orbit is characterized by constant distance from the planet, suggesting that gravitational potential energy does not change in a circular orbit.
  • One participant argues that in a circular orbit, both potential and kinetic energy remain constant, challenging the idea that energy is continuously transformed.
  • Another participant notes that in elliptical orbits, the distance from the massive body changes, leading to variations in potential and kinetic energy, with the satellite moving faster when closer to the body.
  • There is a contention regarding whether gravitational potential energy can be considered infinite in the context of continuous transformation into kinetic energy during orbital motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of energy transformation in orbits, with some agreeing that energy remains constant in circular orbits while others highlight changes in elliptical orbits. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these transformations on the conservation of energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific conditions such as circular versus elliptical orbits, but there is no consensus on the implications of these conditions for energy conservation. The discussion also touches on external forces like atmospheric friction, which may influence energy changes.

minijumbuk
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Pe = Potential energy
Ke = kinetic energy

i want to clear up some confusion in me...
firstly...it is true to say that potential energy transforms into kinetic energy as an object...correct?

then the definition of an ORBIT is constantly falling around a planet, non-stop...

therefore, Poetential energy is constantly being transformed into kinetic energy
and an orbit is continuous and will never stop unless an external force acts upon it. i.e. the Pe will continue to transform into Ke for all eternity, which also implies there is infinite Potential energy...which contradicts the law of conservation of energy...

o.O i know Pe can be calculated by the height from which it is above the center of earth, but that is not the point...

so is there anything wrong with what i said? or have i proved physics contradictory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
minijumbuk said:
Pe = Potential energy
Ke = kinetic energy

i want to clear up some confusion in me...
firstly...it is true to say that potential energy transforms into kinetic energy as an object...correct?
It's certainly true that PE can often be transformed into KE--just drop a ball.

then the definition of an ORBIT is constantly falling around a planet, non-stop...
I presume you mean "falling" compared to the satellite's path if the planet wasn't there--the planet and satellite exert forces on each other. The orbiting satellite is constantly changing the direction of its motion, not necessarily its distance to the planet.

therefore, Poetential energy is constantly being transformed into kinetic energy
and an orbit is continuous and will never stop unless an external force acts upon it. i.e. the Pe will continue to transform into Ke for all eternity, which also implies there is infinite Potential energy...which contradicts the law of conservation of energy...
Sorry... I don't get what you're saying. What makes you think that an orbiting satellite is constantly losing PE and gaining KE? Only if it's crashing into the planet! In a circular orbit, for example, the PE and KE of the system remain the same.

o.O i know Pe can be calculated by the height from which it is above the center of earth, but that is not the point...
I'm afraid that is the point. If the distance between satellite and planet doesn't change, neither does their combined gravitational PE.
 
Usually, the distance between a satellite and a planet do change. When the distance diminishes Pe diminishes and is transformed in Ke, conversely, when the distance increases, it is the Ke which transforms in Pe. Total energy does not change, unless others forces intervene (e.g. friction with the atmosphere).
 
Understand that neither the distance from the planet nor the speed of the satellite changes. This then implies that both the gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy do not change. Yes, it is correct to say that the satellite is constantly falling, but since it doesn't actually get closer to the planet, the gravitational potential energy doesn't change. It is not the act of falling which changes the potential energy, but the act of moving closer to the planet, which the satellite doesn't do. Hence, its gravitational potential energy of the satellite doesn't change.

Hope this helped.
 
Doc Al said:
Sorry... I don't get what you're saying. What makes you think that an orbiting satellite is constantly losing PE and gaining KE? Only if it's crashing into the planet! In a circular orbit, for example, the PE and KE of the system remain the same.

To this I would just add one other noteworthy detail (hopefully not confusing anyone in the process). Gravitational potential energy depends on an object's distance from a massive body. In a circular orrbit this distance never changes. But in the case of an elliptical or parabolic orbit, the satellite's distance from the massive body does change, and along with it, so does the gravitational potential energy. This energy goes into the kinetic energy of the satellite. As a result, a satellite will travel faster when it is closer to the massive body that it is orbiting, and slower when it is farther away.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K