Gravitational Waves: Cosmic Inflation Equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the gravitational wave equation related to gravitational waves produced during cosmic inflation. Participants explore the validity of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric during inflation and the implications for the dynamics of gravitational waves as they re-enter the horizon.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the gravitational wave equation \(\ddot{h}+2H\dot{h} +k^{2}h=0\) is valid during inflation, suggesting that the FRW metric may not apply.
  • Another participant asserts that the equation governing tensor perturbations is \(h'' + 2\frac{a'}{a}h' + k^2 h = 0\), derived under the assumption of FRW expansion, and argues it is valid at all length scales.
  • Several participants express confusion regarding the claim that the FRW metric is not valid during inflation, seeking clarification on this point.
  • One participant notes that inflation is quasi-de Sitter and discusses the differences between the metrics used during inflation and after inflation.
  • Another participant states that de Sitter is a vacuum FRW spacetime, prompting further discussion about the scale factor and its role in the equations derived from the action.
  • There is a debate about the nature of the de Sitter metric, with participants discussing its representation and the implications of its curvature compared to Minkowski space.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on the validity of the FRW metric during inflation and the implications for gravitational wave dynamics. Multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of the de Sitter metric and its relationship to Minkowski space.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the applicability of the FRW metric during inflation and the derivation of gravitational wave equations, highlighting potential limitations in their understanding of the underlying assumptions and definitions.

pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hi not sure if this is GR or cosmology,
does anyone know what the gravitational wave equation is for GW's produced during cosmic inflation is it just \ddot{h}+2H\dot{h} +k^{2}h=0 because this is derivable using the FRW metric which isn't valid during inflastion, does this govern the dynamics as the waves re-enter the horizon?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The equation governing the evolution of tensor perturbations (gravitational waves) generated during inflation is
h'' + 2\frac{a'}{a}h' + k^2 h = 0
where the primes denote derivatives wrt conformal time, d\tau = dt/a (note that a'/a is not the Hubble parameter, which is defined this way in terms of coordinate time: H = \dot{a}/a.)

I'm not clear on your claim about the FRW metric not being valid during inflation -- what do you mean by this? The above EOM is derived assuming FRW expansion, and it is valid at all length scales (including after the mode re-enters the horizon).
 
It is also unclear to me why you say
pleasehelpmeno said:
the FRW metric which isn't valid during inflation
 
well surely inflation is quasi de sitter, so the metric is dt^2-d\underline{X}^2, whereas after infltaion in is FRLW sodt^2-a^{2}d\underline{X}^2.

Isn't that tensor perturbation eqn derived from the action S^{(2)}=\frac{a^{2}(t)}{2}d^{4}x which surely can't occur during inflation.
 
de Sitter is a vacuum FRLW spacetime.
 
Yeah but it doesn't have the scale factor so why in here for example does it derive that equation using an action that contains an a(t)?
 
pleasehelpmeno said:
Yeah but it doesn't have the scale factor so why in here for example does it derive that equation using an action that contains an a(t)?
The scale factor for de Sitter is a(t) \propto \exp(Ht). Why do you think there is no scale factor? (Keep in mind that while the full topological de Sitter space is static, inflationary spacetimes are described by only half of this space).
 
yeah but the metric describing de-sitter space is dt^2 - dx^2 isn't it?

Or during inflation is it dt^2 - a^2 dx^2 ?
 
The same spacetime can look very different in two different coordinate systems. I don't think that I am familiar with a coordinate system for which de Sitter looks like dt^2 - dx^2. Can you give a reference?
 
  • #10
pleasehelpmeno said:
yeah but the metric describing de-sitter space is dt^2 - dx^2 isn't it?

Or during inflation is it dt^2 - a^2 dx^2 ?
de Sitter space looks like ds^2 = dt^2 - \exp(2Ht)dx^2, with H = {\rm const}. It has the FRW form with a(t) = \exp(Ht), and is inflationary since H = {\rm const} \rightarrow \ddot{a}>0.
 
  • #12
pleasehelpmeno said:
Isn't it equivalent to minkowski space http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Sitter_space

No!

Minkowski spacetime has zero spacetime curvature; de Sitter spacetime has non-zero spacetime curvature.

de Sitter spacetime can be considered to be a curved 4-dimensional hypersurface of a 5-dimensional space that has zero curvature.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K