(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); gravitomagnetism equations--wikipedia wrong?

Hi, I read the wikipedia article from:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitoelectromagnetism

(scroll down to the "Maxwell's eq" for gravity)

where it says

[tex]\nabla \times \mathbf{B}=-4\pi G\mathbf{J}[/tex]

(neglect the other terms)

however, when I compare that to Sean Carroll's book of GR (spacetime and geometry),

on page 282, (7.31) it reads something like

[tex] \nabla^2 \mathbf{\omega}=-16 \pi G T_{0j}=-16 \pi G \mathbf{J}[/tex]

Carroll defines,

[tex]\mathbf{B}=\nabla \times \mathbf{\omega}[/tex]

so in effect, we have something like

[tex] \nabla \times \mathbf{B}=-16 \pi G \mathbf{J}[/tex]

while a factor of two is reasonable since the the force law in Carroll's book is without the 2 in front of B, the additional factor of 4 is just weird... I could not get around that at all. Is wikipedia wrong or am I missing something?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Gravitomagnetism equations-wikipedia wrong?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Gravitomagnetism equations wikipedia | Date |
---|---|

I Interesting Derivation of Maxwell's Equations | Mar 11, 2018 |

Gravitomagnetic effect of moving source on test object | Dec 18, 2015 |

Covariant Gravitomagnetism | Jan 7, 2014 |

Why GRT is the proper correction of gravitomagnetism? | Sep 15, 2013 |

Gravitomagnetism: Why isn't mass-current covariant? | Aug 6, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**