Gravity a pushing force?

  1. I've always thought about gravity as a pulling force but perhaps it isn't. Is there anything fundamentally wrong with thinking about gravity as a pushing force attenuated by matter?
  2. jcsd
  3. ZapperZ

    ZapperZ 30,533
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Physics isn't just "what comes up must come down". Physics must also say when and where it comes down.

    When you are considering something like this, you simply cannot do it via hand waving argument. You need to produce accurate, mathematical description that matches all our current observations on gravity. It is only after you can present that will something like this be considered and taken seriously. Otherwise, you will be another one of the people who come here with some vague idea and wanting the rest of us to do the dirty work of falsifying something that is half baked. This is not something we do in this forum, because there are in infinite number of such scenarios that anyone can come up with.

  4. Bandersnatch

    Bandersnatch 1,518
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

  5. Are you referring to what Michio Kaku said in the TV documentary on Einstein?

  6. Matterwave

    Matterwave 3,844
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    When Michio Kaku made that statement... my mind exploded...:eek:
  7. What was his comment?
  8. Believe it or not, he said that gravity doesn't pull you. The relativistic explanation of gravity is that it pushes you. Here is a link to the documentary, now available from youtube:

    This is one of the shows that got me interested in studying Relativity. I wanted to find out whether what they were saying was correct or not. In this case, Yiiiiiiiiiii!!!!!!

    I don't know how he could say something like this in a medium where it would be preserved forever for people to see.

    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 25, 2014
  9. A.T.

    A.T. 6,326
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    He talks about "space pushing" objects towards the mass after 2:00:

    I guess it is his way to describe inertia: As an interaction with space, which opposes deviations from free fall. Not my favorite way to put it.
  10. Yes. He also mis-states in no uncertain terms that Special Relativity does not apply to accelerating objects. Many of the things said in this video are a PF "worst nightmare."

    On the other hand, I love this video because of the historical perspective and the personal stories, including Einstein's "soap opera" personal life, his relationship to Planck and Haber, and the stories about the attempts to prove GR using solar eclipses.

    Last edited: May 5, 2014
  11. Man, that was a terrible video. Why do they even try...
  12. Jano L.

    Jano L. 1,286
    Gold Member

    The story about push seemed strange to me too at first. There is this curved 2D surface which pushes the marble to make it move in circles. Perhaps they just wanted to communicate the idea that gravity in Einstein's theory is similar to the curved surface. Instead of "curvature determines the trajectory" they said gravity pushes the body to make it similar to the curved surface where the marble indeed moves in circles due to push (contact forces of constraint cannot pull)...

    ...I rather would not be too harsh on them. This is probably close to where one can go without using mathematics...
  13. A.T.

    A.T. 6,326
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    That is an even worse analogy. Discussed many time here.

    One can do much better without using mathematics:
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thead via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Draft saved Draft deleted