Gravity Change by Canister Pressure: Gas in Balloon

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ANarwhal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical implications of compressing gas within a balloon and whether this would result in a detectable change in gravitational effects, particularly in relation to buoyancy and measurements using an accelerometer. The scope includes theoretical exploration and practical considerations for detecting changes in gravity with DIY lab equipment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if compressing gas in a canister within a balloon would create a detectable change in gravity.
  • Another participant suggests that while there would be a change due to potential energy, it would be negligible and would alter the buoyancy of the gas.
  • There is a query about whether an accelerometer placed above the balloon could measure this change, with some participants discussing what the accelerometer would actually measure.
  • A participant posits that the only way to detect a change would be if the accelerometer moved closer to the center of mass of the gas, potentially causing a slight increase in measured gravity.
  • Several participants express skepticism about the feasibility of detecting such subtle changes in gravity with DIY equipment, citing the limitations of current technology.
  • One participant explains a theoretical method involving measuring the stretch of a spring when masses are brought close together, but notes the challenges due to the weakness of gravitational forces and external noise.
  • Another participant humorously suggests a non-scientific method of measuring weight changes through food consumption.
  • There is a discussion about the practical difficulties of measuring gravitational changes and the suggestion that tracking planetary motions might be a more feasible approach for hobbyists.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the detectability of gravitational changes, with no consensus reached on whether such changes could be measured with DIY equipment. There is general agreement on the challenges posed by the subtlety of the changes and the limitations of current measurement techniques.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the changes in gravity due to the compression of gas would be very subtle and difficult to measure against the backdrop of Earth's gravity. The discussion highlights the dependence on sensitive instruments and the potential for external noise to interfere with measurements.

ANarwhal
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
If I had a balloon full of gas, and inside that balloon a solid canister that had a much smaller volume than the balloon but could hold all the gas inside the balloon under pressure, would there be a (detectable or theoretical) change in the gravity generated by forcing all the gas into the canister under pressure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, due to the potential energy created, but it would be negligable. However, it would change the bouyancy of the gas, due to the reduction in volume, so the net force on the gas would change.
 
Would I be able to detect this change with an accelerometer placed immediately above the balloon?
 
ANarwhal said:
Would I be able to detect this change with an accelerometer placed immediately above the balloon?

What is it that the accelerometer would be measuring?
 
The acceleration towards a point, in this case it would be both the Earth and the compressed gas (due to its heightened gravitational pull (I'm not for a second saying it would be a big gravitational pull, I'm just interested in measuring it))
 
ANarwhal said:
The acceleration towards a point, in this case it would be both the Earth and the compressed gas (due to its heightened gravitational pull (I'm not for a second saying it would be a big gravitational pull, I'm just interested in measuring it))

If I correctly understand what your saying, then no I don't see how there would be any difference UNLESS the accelerometer moved closer to the center of mass of the gas, since that would cause a tiny increase in the gravity measured by the accelerometer (the amount would not be measurable with anything like today's technology but it would exist)
 
Is there any way I can create a change in gravity that I could monitor with DIY lab equipment?
 
ANarwhal said:
Is there any way I can create a change in gravity that I could monitor with DIY lab equipment?

I don't have any answer for that but I'll bet some of the more clever folks here will.
 
ANarwhal said:
Is there any way I can create a change in gravity that I could monitor with DIY lab equipment?

You have to define what you mean by "change in gravity". If you mean change in the gravitational force felt by some object, then...yes...it's very easy, you just change the mass of that object (cut off a piece of it), the gravitational force will reduce. Take a piece of putty and weigh it, and then cut off a piece and weigh it again, the lower reading shows a reduction in the gravitational force...

But I suspect this is not what you mean.
 
  • #10
Matterwave said:
But I suspect this is not what you mean.

Right ... I was going to suggest that he eat a Big Mac and then reweigh himself, but I came to the same conclusion that you did so bit my tongue.:smile:
 
  • #11
I want to detect a change without touching the object (for example, an accelerometer dangling above an object)
 
  • #12
I don't think you'll be able to do that w/ DIY equipment because the change will be very subtle almost whatEVER you do, relative to the gravity of the earth, which you can't remove from the experiment.

For example, I believe that the discovery and mapping of mascons in the Earth required very sensitive instruments and you are NOT going to come close to producing a mascon.
 
  • #13
The theory is simple. You hang a mass from a spring and bring another mass up close below it. The spring will stretch slightly and you use Hooke's law to measure the force. Then you try again with a smaller mass and you'll see a smaller stretch.

The problem is how weak gravity is. Two 1000kg masses with their centers separated by 1m (think about the size of a 1000kg mass) produce around a 0.07mN force. Any spring balance sensitive enough to detect this will snap when you attach a 1000kg mass. If you try a smaller mass then the force goes down (so harder to measure) and (in a double whammy) the system becomes extremely sensitive to thermal noise - draughts, Brownian motion, cars passing in the street, earthquakes thousands of miles away, etc, etc.

Measuring g between two known masses is the way we calculate G. The pros take years to make a measurement, and they frequently disagree. You could be decades at this and get nothing but noise - sorry.

Easier: track planetary motions and confirm that the orbits match predictions from theory. More maths and more indirect, but practicable for the dedicated hobbyist, I would think, given that Kepler and Newton have already done the heavy lifting.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K