Gravity: Explaining the Mysteries of Weight and Falling

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concepts of gravity, weight, and the behavior of falling objects, particularly in relation to air resistance and mass. Participants explore the implications of these concepts in both theoretical and experimental contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why a book falls faster than a piece of paper of the same shape and size, suggesting that weight or mass should influence the rate of fall.
  • Another participant asserts that mass is related to acceleration due to gravity, referencing the equation F = ma.
  • A different participant challenges the claim that two objects of the same shape and size but different mass fall at the same rate, stating that only in a vacuum does acceleration remain constant regardless of mass.
  • One participant combines the equations F = Gm1m2 / r^2 and F = m1a to argue that the acceleration of a falling object depends on the mass of the Earth, not the mass of the object itself, under realistic conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the influence of mass and air resistance on falling objects. There is no consensus on the implications of these factors, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various equations and concepts, but there are limitations in the assumptions made regarding air resistance and the conditions under which the discussed phenomena occur.

Jow
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
I love physics, but I find that I am ignorant about some of the more basic concepts, so forgive me if this question may sound a bit foolish.
My teacher the other day demonstrated that all objects fall at the same rate on earth. The only reason things don't seem to follow this rules is because of air resistance. He showed that when flat, paper falls slower than a golf ball, but when crumpled to the size of the golfball they fall at the same rate.
I have two questions about this. I know that a book will fall faster than a piece of paper of the same shape and size. I tested at home to make sure. If it has nothing to do with weight than why does the book fall faster?
Also, shouldn't weight, or mass make a difference. If F = Gm1m2 / r^2, than surely the more massive something is than the faster it will fall. My textbook answers neither of these questions, so it would be much aporeciated if you could answer them. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Jow,

For your first question, you can't simply neglect the weight or the mass of the book because its already clear that F = ma.

Its already stated that mass is related to acceleration (gravity).
 
Jow said:
but when crumpled to the size of the golfball they fall at the same rate.
That is not true. Two objects of exactly the same shape/size, but different mass fall at different rates in the atmosphere. Only in vacuum the acceleration is the same, because gravity is the only force acting and proportional to mass. But air resistance is not dependent of mass. At the same velocity the opposing air resistance is the same for both objects, but the weight is different. So the net force and acceleration are different. At low velocities the drag is low, and the difference is not noticeable which allows the teacher to fool the students.
 
Jow said:
If F = Gm1m2 / r^2, than surely the more massive something is than the faster it will fall. My textbook answers neither of these questions, so it would be much aporeciated if you could answer them. Thank you.
And F=m1a. Combine both equations, and you get a = Gm2/r^2, which depends on the mass of Earth but not on the mass of the falling object. If the falling object has a mass similar to earth, you would have to take the motion of Earth into account, but that can be neglected for any realistic experiment.
 
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=511172
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K