Gravity of a Rotating Cylindrical Space Station: Confirmation Needed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the physics of a rotating cylindrical space station, specifically addressing the apparent gravity experienced by an astronaut climbing a spoke. The fractional change in apparent gravity is calculated as (1 - m/M)², where M is the mass of the station and m is the mass of the astronaut. Additionally, when the astronaut climbs halfway up and lets go, he will land at a distance of (π/3 - √3)r from the base of the spoke. Both solutions provided are confirmed as accurate by other participants in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum conservation
  • Familiarity with rotational dynamics
  • Knowledge of basic kinematics
  • Concept of apparent gravity in rotating systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of angular momentum in rotating systems
  • Explore the effects of mass changes on angular velocity
  • Learn about kinematic equations in non-inertial reference frames
  • Investigate the dynamics of objects in rotating frames of reference
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rotating systems and space station design.

99wattr89
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
A cylindrical space station of radius r with thin walls and mass M rotates at angular velocity ω such that the apparent gravity on the inner surface of the cylinder is equal to g.

1) Radial spokes of negligible mass connect the cylinder to the centre of motion. An astronaut of mass m climbs a spoke to the centre. What is the fractional change in apparent gravity on the surface of the cylinder?

2) If the astronaut climbs halfway up a spoke and let's go, how far form the base of the spoke will he hit the cylinder? Assume the astronaut is point like.

Solution:

1) For the first part I got that the ratio of apparent gravity before and after will be (1 - m/M)2, because angular momentum is invariant but the space station can change angular velocity, so Mrv1 = (M-m)rv2

This is a little confusing though, because if the station is effectively losing mass m, so the new mass is M-m, then the angular velocity should have to go up so that angular momentum stays the same! Why doesn't that happen? Shouldn't the effective gravity also increase as a result of the increased angular velocity?

2) The astronaut should fly off tangentially, and had to cover a distance (√3)r/2 to reach the edge of the cylinder, and he's traveling at ωr/2, so he should arrive √3/ω seconds later, right? Should the spoke stop turning he would arrive Pi/3 radians ahead of spoke.

And in that time, the spoke turns through ωt radians, which gives √3 radians.

So the angle subtending the arc between him and the spoke should be (Pi/3 - √3) radians, placing him (Pi/3 - √3)r away from the foot of the spoke.


Can anyone confirm or deny that these methods and answers are accurate? They both feel wrong to me.

Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your solutions and methods are correct. The answer to the first part is indeed (1 - m/M)2 and the second part is also correct with the answer being (π/3 - √3)r away from the foot of the spoke.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K