Gravity violating the conservation of energy in a closed system?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the implications of gravitational interactions in a closed system and the conservation of energy. The thought experiment presented involves two masses at rest, where gravitational attraction leads to an increase in kinetic energy while raising questions about the total energy of the system. The conclusion reached is that the potential energy imparted by the gravitational field accounts for the energy balance, affirming that the total energy remains constant as kinetic energy increases and gravitational potential energy decreases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²)
  • Familiarity with the law of conservation of energy
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy
  • Concept of closed systems in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of gravitational binding energy in astrophysics
  • Study the mathematical formulation of the law of conservation of energy
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy in dynamic systems
  • Investigate thought experiments in physics and their role in theoretical understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators, and anyone interested in the principles of energy conservation and gravitational interactions in closed systems.

logos
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have devised a simple thought experiment which leads me to an absurd conclusion and I feel I’m missing something obvious but I can't see where I’m wrong and I hope you could help point out my error.

I start with an empty space initially containing two masses that are at rest relative to each other, the total energy of this system would be the rest mass (E=mc2) right?

But as time starts gravity will start accelerating these masses towards each other giving me the energy of the rest mass + a non 0 kinetic energy. This would in my mind imply either a decrease in the mass of the objects or an increase of the total energy of the closed system, neither of which seem logical?

Now I realize I’m probably missing something obvious here but I can't for my life figure out what…
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you put the first mass in the system, all is fine and dandy. However, by placing the second mass in the system, you obviously impart a potential energy to each mass. This potential energy is what accounts for the missing energy in your thought experiment.
 
What is the rest mass of a gravitationally bound system?

Presumably it is less than that of its components, by the amount of the escape energy. Might not be trivial to prove the difference in the system's inertia.
 
Last edited:
Pengwuino said:
When you put the first mass in the system, all is fine and dandy. However, by placing the second mass in the system, you obviously impart a potential energy to each mass. This potential energy is what accounts for the missing energy in your thought experiment.

Ah, of course. As I thought it’s obvious now that somebody pointed it out. I blame not noticing it myself on having substituted sleep with caffeine for to long now during exam season…

Anyway thanks so much for the help. :smile:
 
Be careful with those caffeine substitutions - they work for math but not so much for thought experiments in physics.

To add to the above:
Law of conservation of energy (simplified)
For this system -> Etotal = EK + EG
Where EK is the kinetic energy of the system and EG is the gravitational potential energy.

Etotal is constant in a closed system like the one you described, so you can see that as your masses are drawn together by the force of gravity, EG decreases as EK increases. :P
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
770
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
16K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K