Gre Problem # 60 speed of a particle

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving the Lyman alpha spectral line of hydrogen and the calculation of the speed of particles on the Sun's equator due to its rotation. The original poster calculated a speed of 4.4 km/s using the Doppler formula but noted that the correct answer is 2.2 km/s. The key point of confusion was clarified: while the difference in observed wavelengths from opposite sides of the Sun's equator results in a 4.4 km/s measurement, the actual speed of the particles is 2.2 km/s, as they are moving in opposite directions. Additionally, a correction was made regarding the use of units for the speed of light in the calculations, emphasizing the importance of using consistent units to arrive at the correct answer.
quantumworld
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hello brainy people,
I did solve this problem, but my answer is double the correct one, I wonder what went wrong.
here it is:
The Lyman alpha spectral line of hydrogen (lambda = 122 nm) differs by 1.8*10^-12 m in spectra taken at opposite ends of the sun's equator. What is the speed of a particle on the equator due to the Sun's rotation, in kilometers per second?

I used the doppler formula, delta lambda/lambda = v/c
so I got c = 4.4 Km/s, but the correct answer is 2.2 km/s

thanks for your effort
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One one limb of the Sun, the particles are approaching you. On the other, they are receding from you. The difference from one side to the other is 4.4 km/s, but the particles are only moving 2.2 km/s; they're just moving in opposite directions on opposite limbs of the Sun.

- Warren
 


Hello there,

Thank you for sharing your solution to this GRE problem. It seems like you have correctly used the Doppler formula to solve for the speed of the particle on the equator due to the Sun's rotation. However, there is one small error in your calculation. When using the Doppler formula, it is important to use the correct units for the speed of light, which is meters per second (m/s), not kilometers per second (km/s). Therefore, the correct calculation would be:

c = (1.8*10^-12 m) * (3.0*10^8 m/s) / (122 nm)
= 4.4*10^-5 m/s

Converting this to kilometers per second, we get:

c = 4.4*10^-5 m/s * (1 km/1000 m) * (3600 s/1 hr)
= 1.584 km/hr

This is the correct answer of 2.2 km/s that you were given. I hope this helps clarify the issue and good luck with your GRE preparation!
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
601
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K