Great Cambrian Fossils
- Thread starter BillTre
- Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 3K views
Discussion
Biology news on Phys.org
sbrothy
Gold Member
- 1,866
- 1,538
Wow. Nice and thought-provoking pictures. I'd imagine a lot of fossils following the Cambrian Explosion. Embarrassingly I don't know enough to tell with any confidence if Cambrian fossils mean they were "made" during the actual Cambrian epoch. I'd guess so but honestly I don't know. Must be a lot left from that particular epoch I'd imagine though.BillTre said:Here are some great pictures and an open access article from Quanta magazine of Cambrian fossils (like Burgess Shale) from Southern China.
Example:
View attachment 371362
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 2,836
- 12,601
Yes, those were fossils from the Cambrian period (period named after where the fossils from that time were first found).
PreCambrian fossils were even simpler (such as lacking appendages and a large variety of tissue types).
The significance of this period is that these are the first known examples of animal body plans. Since the first animal body plans were being evolved then, many were weird looking to us today and are considered evolution experiments. Many current body plans evolved from these.
Many are soft body fossils which are rare because they have to be rapidly buried before they are eaten or destroyed by the environment. The Burgess shale fossils (a different Cambrian fossil site) are thought to be the result of repeated rapid burials by fine grained underwater landslides from a neighboring slope. These unlikely to happen events combined with the age of the rocks, make these fossils very rare.
PreCambrian fossils were even simpler (such as lacking appendages and a large variety of tissue types).
The significance of this period is that these are the first known examples of animal body plans. Since the first animal body plans were being evolved then, many were weird looking to us today and are considered evolution experiments. Many current body plans evolved from these.
Many are soft body fossils which are rare because they have to be rapidly buried before they are eaten or destroyed by the environment. The Burgess shale fossils (a different Cambrian fossil site) are thought to be the result of repeated rapid burials by fine grained underwater landslides from a neighboring slope. These unlikely to happen events combined with the age of the rocks, make these fossils very rare.
Similar threads
How do evolutionists construct descendency trees from fossils?
- Al-Layth
- · Replies 1 ·
- Biology and Medical
- Replies
- 1
Fossil Digging: 400-500 Million Yr Old Kansas Fossils
- Evo
- · Replies 3 ·
- Biology and Medical
- Replies
- 3
Is the Cambrian Explosion the End of Phyla Evolution?
- talus
- · Replies 165 ·
- Biology and Medical
- Replies
- 165
What Fossils Can You Find Outside?
- Evo
- · Replies 43 ·
- Biology and Medical
- Replies
- 43
So, talk to me about the Cambrian Explosion por favor.
- wasteofo2
- · Replies 2 ·
- Biology and Medical
- Replies
- 2
Are micro-organisms fossils on so-called Martian meteorite true?
- Akihiro
- · Replies 2 ·
- Biology and Medical
- Replies
- 2
Formation and evolution of the Great Lakes in US/Canada border
- Astronuc
- · Replies 8 ·
- Earth Sciences
- Replies
- 8
Quantum Learning Quantum Mechanics with Great Courses Plus
- bhobba
- · Replies 4 ·
- Science and Math Textbooks
- Replies
- 4
Plant or Animal? Mysterious Fossils Defy Classification
- Evo
- · Replies 0 ·
- Earth Sciences
- Replies
- 0
Are Egypt's Pyramids Built from Marine Fossils?
- wolram
- · Replies 2 ·
- Earth Sciences
- Replies
- 2